HE media wags are
still having a field day over that erroneous reporting by one television station
making it appear that renegade Marine Capt. Nicanor Faeldon lambasted Senator
Gregorio Honasan for allegedly capitulating to the Arroyo administration. That,
after Honasan was purportedly part of the 2003 Oakwood mutiny, in which played a
very visible part.
The news story was not so much as Faeldon lambasting Honasan.
It was, in effect, first-hand testimony, re-implicating Honasan. Something that
government prosecutors had unsuccessfully tried to do before.
Lucky for Honasan, he was out of the country on official
business. Media could not get his side and having him air his side on the matter
would only have made things worse for him.
Apparently, the television station was too engrossed with
getting a "scoop" and would not allow a trivial thing such as checking and
verifying the facts. Even though every unbiased mind would have started
wondering since when did the natives of Batanes, where Faeldon, hails from,
acquire a Visayan accent. Checking the facts could have spared everyone of the
resulting embarrassment since the only thing that news story had going for it
was it seemed believable.
That being said, the initial reactions were brutal. A lawyer
of the Magdalo group quoted his clients as having burst out into a rain of
guffaws when they heard the news being aired on television. At least, Faeldon’s
lawyer, Trixie Cruz-Angeles, was a bit kinder in her commentary. Referring to
Faeldon, Angeles said: "That’s not him. That’s not his style."
Having left without a leg to stand on and under ethical
pressure to retract and apologize for the blunder, the television station did
the second best thing. It admitted it may have been wrong but also insinuates
that the whole thing could have been one big military operation to force Faeldon
to come out of hiding. Right or wrong, however, it still does not absolve the
television station of the responsibility of undoing the damage done to the
reputation of a senator.
Then there is the case of the Metro Manila Development
Authority (MMDA) shutting down two bus terminals along EDSA in Cubao, Quezon
City for allegedly violating its "nose in, nose out" policy. Actually, the MMDA
simply shut down the "violators" by putting concrete barriers in front of their
terminals.
While the objective of improving traffic flow is laudable,
the actions of the MMDA and its chairman Bayani Fernando are seemingly far from
legal. The last time I read up the law, nothing in the MMDA charter empowers it
to make and enforce laws since it is a coordinating body. The thing to have done
there was to coordinate the shutdown of the bus terminals with the Quezon City
government but this was never going to be the case.
Fernando will implement whatever law in the way he imagines
it suits his agenda best, regardless of the consequences social and legal
consequences. Never mind if his mindless insistence will even humiliate his
bosses in Malacañang as what had happened when it issued an executive order
suspending the implementation of the various local traffic codes and co-opting
them to use the MMDA traffic violation report. Fernando knows very well that
such an order is illegal since a long line of Supreme Court rulings has already
made it clear that the agency has no power to make and enforce laws, which
covers apprehending traffic violators.
We can only be grateful that Fernando and the television reporter who made
that Faeldon news story did not enter the military service. Give them a
battalion of soldiers to command and they would probably shoot dead a busload of
civilians if somebody ever told them that one of the passengers may be a
high-ranking terrorist. There is why we should never be guided by the dictum of
"shoot first, ask questions later," especially if we are not willing to take the
fall.