ast week the Reproduc-tive Health
Bill passed through the committee hearing stage at the House of Representatives
by a comfortable margin of 19 in favor, 7 against and 4 abstentions. Following
the vote, a number of congressmen decided to add their names to the list of
sponsors of the bill. It is now in the hands of the House leadership as to
whether or not the reproductive health issue will be discussed rationally on the
floor of the House.
For advocates of the bill, there is no longer any question
that most politicians have seen the light and acknowledge that the voice of the
people who are clamoring for access to reproductive health information and
services count for more than the views of a benighted minority of Talibanic
extremists.
The next big question is where the Senate of the Philippines
stands on the issue. The three lady senators presumably see the issue as being
an integral part of a women's rights package and are likely to be in favor of
most provisions. It is however still uncertain that, on this politically charged
subject, any of the senators will publicly promote open and frank discussions
that can lead to consolidating and clearing the two Senate proposals (the Biazon
and Lacson bills) on record. Population and women's rights advocates need to
focus pressure on the silent senators on this issue.
***
Greed, politics, religious extremism, unseemly pride, and
plain bullheadedness are all erecting almost insurmountable barriers to the
alleviation of the misery of the majority of individuals, families and
communities in the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao.
Health status indicators in the region are the worst in the
country and among the worst in the world. From the viewpoint of health, if, as
is feared by many, the peace process ends up with a new country, it will most
certainly be ranked in the least developed category.
Although the discussions regarding the situation in Southern
Philippines rightly concentrate on issues of violence and cessation of
hostilities, it may serve to soften positions on either side if the social
development concerns are made more prominent. The leadership of the health
sector on both sides is almost certain to be in agreement if they discuss issues
from the perspective of the high maternal and infant mortality rates and the
unavailability of basic health services.
***
Commercial kidney transplantation in the context of a high
poverty rate is grossly unethical and simply amounts to exploitation of the
already suffering poor majority of Filipinos. For as long as the poor do not
have an equal chance of availing of modern interventions as rich Filipinos and
foreigners, buying one of their kidneys is an inequitable transaction - even if
the price paid to the donor is equivalent to the professional fees of the
transplant surgeons and the hospitals.
The present efforts to re-establish renal transplants from
paid unrelated living donors are doomed to failure because loopholes and
incentives for abuse will be almost impossible to identify. This is especially
likely if the mechanisms regulating the sale of kidneys are designed mainly by
those who profit from the commercialization of this modern medical intervention.
***
Last January, infectious disease experts were already
commenting on the unusually high number of dengue cases for that month. This
should have been taken as a warning that this year's dengue season would be
worse than the last few years. True enough, the monthly numbers for the dry
season have turned out to be more than in previous dry seasons.
As the dengue season started in June, the numbers of cases
have kept rising. There are signs that this will be the worst season since 1998
when record numbers were reported at the peaks in October and November. It is
worth noting that the DOH approaches were developed during the record 1998
season.
However, the health research community should be concerned
that, in 10 years, no new approaches to dengue prevention and control have been
developed for a problem that has confronted the health community year in and
year out for decades.
***
At a recent health meeting, a representative of the
pharmaceutical industry pointed out that prices of drugs and medicines have not
risen despite rising costs of all inputs. It is certainly to the credit of the
industry that it has, in these difficult times, been able to "moderate its
greed." On the other hand, this may also be tacit admission that the profits of
these companies have been so high in the past that it is not a problem for them
to absorb added costs resulting from rising oil and other commodity prices.
***
Fragmentation and lack of coordination of basic health
services probably accounts for most of the deaths of women and children related
to the reproductive process. Even as the poor are unable to pay for specialist
care, resources continue to be focused on specialist-led interventions with
little or no participation by non-medical health professions.
It is curious that in this country, midwives seem to have taken over the
reproductive health care of the poor. Many physicians, especially those who work
closely with midwives at community level, are still involved in this area of
health. Nevertheless, it seems that the medical profession for the most part and
certainly the nursing profession have basically abandoned their roles in the
reproductive process especially among the poor.