Ong loses bid
at CA
to regain NBI post
THE Court of Appeals has denied the bid of
former National Bureau of Investigation
official-turned-fugitive Samuel Ong to regain his post as
Director III of the bureau, citing his failure to prove that
he is entitled to tenure.
Ong in 2005 claimed to have possession of a
master tape containing the alleged conversation between
President Arroyo and former Elections commissioner Virgilio
Garcillano wherein the president allegedly asked the latter to
rig the results of the May 2004 elections in Mindanao in her
favor.
Ong filed the petition before the CA prior to
his expose then went into hiding following the filing of
sedition charges against him by the Department of Justice in
July 2005.
In a decision penned by Associate Justice
Isaias Dicdican, the CA’s Eleventh Division junked the petition
filed by Ong seeking to declare his removal from the NBI
illegal. The CA said Ong’s dismissal was legal due to his
failure to meet two requirements – the Career Executive Service
eligibility and appointment to the appropriate CES rank – that
would have enabled him to attain security of tenure.
The CA said Ong’s appointment could thus be
regarded only as temporary and could be withdrawn at will by the
President, who is the appointing authority.
Court records showed that Ong received on
June 3, 2004 a memorandum circular issued by then NBI Director
Reynaldo Wycoco informing him that his appointment, being
co-terminus with the President, would end at midnight on June
30, 2004 and unless a new appointment is issued in his favor by
the President, he would be occupying his position in a holdover
status until his replacement is named.
On Dec. 1, 2004, President Arroyo appointed
Victor A. Bessat as Director III to replace Ong.
Wycoco subsequently notified Ong that
effective Dec. 17, 2004, he should cease from performing his
functions.
On Feb. 22, 2005, Ong petitioned the CA
seeking to nullify his removal, order Bessat out, and reinstate
him to Director III with full back pay. As a career officer, Ong
said was entitled to a security of tenure even if he was a non-CESO
eligible. He added that Arroyo’s reelection in 2004 also
extended his appointment which was co-terminus with her tenure.
The Department of Justice sedition charges against Ong in
2005 after finding probable cause against him for making public
statements that "tended to disturb and obstruct the President in
executing the functions of her office." – Evangeline C. de
Vera