he Department of
Justice (DOJ) has filed a case of "syndicated estafa" against 17 officials of
the Manila Electric Company (Meralco) led by its board chair and chief executive
officer Manuel "Manolo" Lopez. This is a non-bailable crime, which means that
the Pasig Regional Trial Court (RTC) should soon be issuing a warrant of arrest
for the 17 accused.
If even a former president was charged with a similar non-bailable
offense and a senator charged with another non-bailable offense continues to rot
in a military detention, a test of our justice system is whether these white
collar suspects will also suffer the same fate. The test is whether it is one
law for all except for the very rich who stand accused in the P899 million
Meralco estafa case.
As the DOJ did not recommend bail for the accused, they
should also be jailed if only to affirm the tenet of justice that no one is
above the law.
Was there any bias on the part of DOJ Secretary Raul
Gonzalez, because he allowed the filing despite the fact that the complainant,
National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms, Inc. (NASECORE), a
consumer advocacy group that has been at the forefront in raising nationwide
awareness and consumer education on electricity issues, was exempted from paying
the filing fee?
It was President Ramon Magsaysay who said "those who have
less in life should have more in law."
The message of the DOJ is that the rich cannot take advantage
of the poor just because the victims do not have the money for the filing fees,
specially that the NASECORE complaint is imbued with public interest, since it
is the people who would profit from the judgment.
The travesty of justice would be the Lopezes laughing their
way to the bank with P899 million representing the interest earned of Meralco
customers’ bill and meter deposits, just because the aggrieved consumers could
not pay the P8.9 million filing fee.
The real issue here is that Meralco has been using all tricks
in the book to, first, overcharge its customers, and secondly, delay any refund
arising from such overcharging.
What immediately comes to mind regarding this is the P30
billion of Meralco’s income which it passed on to consumers for the longest time
– from 1994 to 2002 – until the Commission on Audit (COA) discovered the anomaly
and the Supreme Court ordered Meralco to refund the same.
This is why Meralco is doing everything to delay COA in
auditing its financial statements and records, in line with a separate 2006 SC
order in the case Meralco vs. Genaro Lualhati et al (GR No. 166769).
In that decision, the SC approved Meralco’s 2003 provisional
rate increase on the condition that Meralco would justify it by way of an audit
by COA.
Now, Meralco is delaying the audit, probably afraid not only
of failing to justify the increase, but also unwilling to put under public
scrutiny its "sweetheart deals" with Lopez companies like IPPs First Gas and
First Gen.
The P899 million, according to NASECORE, was declared by
Meralco as income in its 2007 submissions with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, instead of holding the same in trust.
The smoking gun was provided by Meralco itself. All that
NASECORE had to do was read the financial statements that the company submitted
to the SEC. Case closed.
***
We have a letter sent to Chairman Bernardino Abes of the
Government Service Insurance System (GSIS). I am including this in my column
only to help the petitioner get the attention of whoever needs to act on this at
the GSIS:
"I am seeking your assistance with a requirement my 88-year
old mother-in-law in Alberta, Canada, Severina Paca, is being asked by Service
Canada to submit in connection with her Old Age Canada pension. As the attached
communication from Service Canada states, they need to know how much pension
Severina Paca has received from the GSIS from 1997 to date.
"She has asked my brother-in-law in Quezon City, Romeo Paca,
to request this from GSIS in Manila, but there seems to be a delay in obtaining
this time-sensitive Canadian government requirement. I am now trying to help her
get the information needed by asking your intercession.
"We would very much appreciate your assistance. More power to
you and best regards. – Jojo Taduran Toronto, Ontario, Canada (www.ugnayan.ca)
(Copies of the letters to GSIS were attached to his e-mail,
which I will also send to the GSIS via e-mail. I wrote back to Jojo: I am using
your letter in my column but if you go to www.gsis.gov.ph, all you need is her
GSIS number to inquire about how much money she has received. You should be able
to get the information!)
***
While Senator Richard Gordon would like to ban all surveys
regarding voter preferences for president in the 2010 elections (in case that
election will actually push through), Senate President Many Villar is probably
pretty pleased with the latest Social Weather Stations survey.
Villar’s rating rose to 25 percent in June compared to 17
percent last March, an increase of eight points. This places Villa at third
among the other prospective presidential candidates.
Vice President Noli De Castro had 31 percent, but Noli’s
rating went down by four points from 35 percent. Sen. Loren Legarda, who placed
second, dropped four points from 30 percent last March.
This means that Loren and Manny are statistically tied since
their difference is less than the plus or minus 3% usual margin of error in
nationwide surveys.
Sen. Panfilo Lacson’s rating, increased, too, but only by
four points from 12 percent last March to 16 percent in June, putting him in
fourth place.
Sen. Francis Escudero also dropped 5 percent to 14 percent
and Sen. Mar Roxas lost three points to just 13 percent in the latest survey.
Even ex-President Joseph Estrada lost three to end at 11
percent.
Compared to the five top leaders of the country–the
President, the Vice President, the Senate President, the Speaker of the House of
Representatives and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Manny Villar was the
"most preferred."
Writing on the wall or, as Dick Gordon would prefer, just a statistical
glitch?