he 7.5 percent growth of
the economic during the second quarter is simply out-standing. It’s the first
time the economy grew that much since the period immediately following the
downfall of Ferdinand Marcos in 1986. The question now is whether such pace of
expansion is sustainable.
Gloria Arroyo expressed confidence the surge in the last two
quarters was no fluke. She said she was sticking, however, to a full-year growth
projection of 6.1 to 6.7 percent, and build on the gains for bigger growth
presumably in the two-and-a-half years remaining in her term.
That’s the prudent course, we suppose, for the momentum is
already faltering in the third quarter. And dark clouds are looming on the
horizon.
We do not mean to rain on Arroyo’s parade, but some
economists are already joking about the apparent underestimation of the spending
during the May elections. For there is no question that election spending was
the prime driver of the perk in consumer demand. That’s one spending booster we
would not be seeing again until 2010.
Another major driver was government spending. The first
quarter growth in government expenditure was 9.9 percent. This surged to 13.5
percent during the second quarter.
There should actually be no surprises here. Arroyo said at
the start of the year that after the belt-tightening of years past, her
government would be ratcheting up spending this year. It was time, she said, the
people got their share of dividends from higher taxes. Spent she did as
promised. That the pump-priming took place during the election period was not
coincidental.
Now what’s the score on the fiscal front? Collections of the
Bureau of Internal Revenue, the biggest source of government revenues, were
below targets. This was the reason BIR chief Jose Mario Buñag was sacked. We
don’t see any likelihood the new BIR leadership would be able to squeeze more
from taxpayers.
Now let’s take a look from the supply side. The drought at
the start of the second semester is sure to take its toll on agricultural
production. Agriculture accounts for the GNP and almost half of the population
earns its livelihood from this sector. And the impact of low agriculture output
on industrial production cannot be under-estimated. The growth driver on the
production side was services, specifically trade and financial.
With an anemic agriculture and manufacturing, growth will
continue to be "ampaw," crunchy on the surface, all air inside.
But on balance, the growth momentum of the first semester can
be expected to be carried forward into the third quarter and, possibly, the
fourth quarter. We should have a good year barring another shakeout in the world
economy.
We’re keeping our fingers crossed year 2007 won’t prove to be a fluke.