group of
researchers, writing in the Journal of the American Medical Association last
month, reported that eating a mouthful of dark chocolate daily lowers blood
pressure. In their study, 44 people were divided into two groups. One group ate
six grams of dark (with cocoa) chocolate everyday while the other ate the same
amount of white (non-cocoa) chocolate. Small but consistent lowering of blood
pressures was observed in the dark chocolate group.
Before hypertensive patients start on chocolate binges, it
should be noted that cardiovascular experts warn that chocolate candies are also
high in calories and fats and therefore not good for the heart. So as in all
things, moderation in chocolate eating should also be observed.
***
In the United States, infant deaths among blacks have been
steadily falling over the last few decades. While still lagging behind the
national average, infant mortality rate in this population group has dropped to
acceptable levels through the end of the 20th century.
Recently however, neo-natologists in the state of Mississippi
have noted a disturbing upward trend in infant deaths among black and mostly
rural poor families.
The racial disparity is quite striking with the infant
mortality rate among blacks at 14 per thousand live births compared to 6.6 for
whites.
The New York Times reported that doctors in these communities
have raised the possibility that this development may be linked to recent cuts
in welfare and Medicaid. But more important, there also seems to be a link to
the growing epidemics of obesity and diabetes among potential mothers who
sometimes may weigh as much as 300 pounds.
For countries like the Philippines, where access to health
care is severely limited among the poor, such reports confirm the fact that the
so-called diseases of development (cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and stroke)
are most harmful to those who are already disadvantaged by poverty. This should
alert health policy makers to the urgent need to reduce inequities in access to
health services.
***
While the implementing rules and regulations for the Hospital
Detention Law are still under study, private hospitals continue to practice
abusive detention policies to force mostly poor families to pay their bills.
These hospitals are quick to cite stringent government regulations as one of the
factors for the increasing number of closures of private health care facilities.
These groups are also the most resistant to transparent quality control measures
such as public reporting of comparative mortality and morbidity as well as
incidents of medical negligence or poor practices.
Unfortunately, quality assurance advocates are mostly also
health professionals and therefore are hesitant to develop public accountability
instruments for quality improvement in hospitals and other health facilities.
The sad fact is that self-policing in enforcing health care quality regulations
seems to be unworkable in an environment where profits and the bottom-line are
the dominant values.
This is also the experience in developed countries where
publicly disclosed hospital statistics were only recently introduced. The recent
release by the United States Department of Health and Human Services of
mortality rates for heart surgery caught many of the major cardiovascular
centers in that country by surprise. Many of them responded by vehement denials,
denouncing the report as flawed and unfair. Nevertheless, a good number took the
report as an input to further strengthen their efforts to improve the quality of
their services.
***
Erythropoietin is a hormone produced by kidney cells to
promote the production of red blood cells (aka erythrocytes) by the bone marrow.
Deficiency of this substance results in anemia or a lack of functioning red
blood cells to carry oxygen from the lungs to the different parts of the body.
For this reason, patients who are in chronic kidney failure generally suffer
from fairly severe anemia.
When injectable forms of erythropoietin were introduced in
the late 80s and early 90s, it was readily adopted as part of the treatment for
renal failure. Over the years evidence has mounted that the product was indeed
quite helpful in maintaining dialysis patients’ functional status and improving
their quality of life.
Erythropoietin-based branded products are sold world-wide by
only two giant pharmaceutical firms – Aranest and Epogen from Amgen; Procrit
from Johnson & Johnson. Combined sales of the products reached ten billion
dollars last year.
Regrettably, these companies have been found to have engaged
in unethical marketing practices by encouraging doctors to over-use
erythropoietin to the detriment of patient’s health. These practices included
withholding information about adverse effects of excessive erythropoietin use as
well as cash payments to doctors or institutions with high prescription rates
for these medicines.
Such incidents cast further doubts on the claims of drug giants that they are
motivated by concerns for patients’ benefits in their quest for innovation and
production of new medicines. The fact is that the two companies are also in the
forefront of the international pharmaceutical lobby working weaken the effects
of the Doha declaration on intellectual property rights that considers public
health as having higher value than commercial gain.