March 19, 2018, 11:18 am
Facebook iconTwitter iconYouTube iconGoogle+ icon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07076 UAE Dirham
1 Philippine Peso = 2.0501 Albanian Lek
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0343 Neth Antilles Guilder
1 Philippine Peso = 0.38842 Argentine Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02496 Australian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0343 Aruba Florin
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03854 Barbados Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 1.59711 Bangladesh Taka
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03064 Bulgarian Lev
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00726 Bahraini Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 33.73757 Burundi Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01927 Bermuda Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02536 Brunei Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.13218 Bolivian Boliviano
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0632 Brazilian Real
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01927 Bahamian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 1.24952 Bhutan Ngultrum
1 Philippine Peso = 0.18446 Botswana Pula
1 Philippine Peso = 385.7418 Belarus Ruble
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03849 Belize Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02523 Canadian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01834 Swiss Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 11.71927 Chilean Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.12196 Chinese Yuan
1 Philippine Peso = 55 Colombian Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 10.83487 Costa Rica Colon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01927 Cuban Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 1.72909 Cape Verde Escudo
1 Philippine Peso = 0.39802 Czech Koruna
1 Philippine Peso = 3.40713 Djibouti Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.11676 Danish Krone
1 Philippine Peso = 0.95896 Dominican Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 2.19576 Algerian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.2451 Estonian Kroon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.33786 Egyptian Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.52447 Ethiopian Birr
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01566 Euro
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03882 Fiji Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01381 Falkland Islands Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01383 British Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.08486 Ghanaian Cedi
1 Philippine Peso = 0.90173 Gambian Dalasi
1 Philippine Peso = 173.4682 Guinea Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14135 Guatemala Quetzal
1 Philippine Peso = 3.95511 Guyana Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15109 Hong Kong Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.45397 Honduras Lempira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.11662 Croatian Kuna
1 Philippine Peso = 1.24432 Haiti Gourde
1 Philippine Peso = 4.86975 Hungarian Forint
1 Philippine Peso = 264.79768 Indonesian Rupiah
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06653 Israeli Shekel
1 Philippine Peso = 1.25202 Indian Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 22.8131 Iraqi Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 726.26201 Iran Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 1.91715 Iceland Krona
1 Philippine Peso = 2.44817 Jamaican Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01361 Jordanian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 2.04193 Japanese Yen
1 Philippine Peso = 1.94701 Kenyan Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 1.31502 Kyrgyzstan Som
1 Philippine Peso = 76.72447 Cambodia Riel
1 Philippine Peso = 7.69364 Comoros Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 17.34104 North Korean Won
1 Philippine Peso = 20.59788 Korean Won
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00577 Kuwaiti Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0158 Cayman Islands Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 6.21407 Kazakhstan Tenge
1 Philippine Peso = 159.5183 Lao Kip
1 Philippine Peso = 29.01156 Lebanese Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 3.00482 Sri Lanka Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 2.52331 Liberian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.23064 Lesotho Loti
1 Philippine Peso = 0.05874 Lithuanian Lita
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01196 Latvian Lat
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02554 Libyan Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.17689 Moroccan Dirham
1 Philippine Peso = 0.31757 Moldovan Leu
1 Philippine Peso = 0.96012 Macedonian Denar
1 Philippine Peso = 25.78035 Myanmar Kyat
1 Philippine Peso = 46.03083 Mongolian Tugrik
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15554 Macau Pataca
1 Philippine Peso = 6.76301 Mauritania Ougulya
1 Philippine Peso = 0.6368 Mauritius Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.3 Maldives Rufiyaa
1 Philippine Peso = 13.74605 Malawi Kwacha
1 Philippine Peso = 0.35992 Mexican Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07528 Malaysian Ringgit
1 Philippine Peso = 0.23044 Namibian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 6.87861 Nigerian Naira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.59692 Nicaragua Cordoba
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14861 Norwegian Krone
1 Philippine Peso = 2.00301 Nepalese Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02669 New Zealand Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00742 Omani Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01927 Panama Balboa
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06293 Peruvian Nuevo Sol
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06089 Papua New Guinea Kina
1 Philippine Peso = 1 Philippine Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 2.12852 Pakistani Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06613 Polish Zloty
1 Philippine Peso = 106.35838 Paraguayan Guarani
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07013 Qatar Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07303 Romanian New Leu
1 Philippine Peso = 1.108 Russian Rouble
1 Philippine Peso = 16.24143 Rwanda Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07225 Saudi Arabian Riyal
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14897 Solomon Islands Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25942 Seychelles Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.34781 Sudanese Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15787 Swedish Krona
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02537 Singapore Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01381 St Helena Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.42786 Slovak Koruna
1 Philippine Peso = 147.01348 Sierra Leone Leone
1 Philippine Peso = 10.88632 Somali Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 384.19653 Sao Tome Dobra
1 Philippine Peso = 0.16859 El Salvador Colon
1 Philippine Peso = 9.92254 Syrian Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.23065 Swaziland Lilageni
1 Philippine Peso = 0.60154 Thai Baht
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0462 Tunisian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.04308 Tongan paʻanga
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0755 Turkish Lira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.12954 Trinidad Tobago Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.56091 Taiwan Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 43.31406 Tanzanian Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 0.50848 Ukraine Hryvnia
1 Philippine Peso = 70.36609 Ugandan Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01927 United States Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.54624 Uruguayan New Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 156.45471 Uzbekistan Sum
1 Philippine Peso = 704.39304 Venezuelan Bolivar
1 Philippine Peso = 438.59343 Vietnam Dong
1 Philippine Peso = 2.01233 Vanuatu Vatu
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0486 Samoa Tala
1 Philippine Peso = 10.2763 CFA Franc (BEAC)
1 Philippine Peso = 0.05202 East Caribbean Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 10.2763 CFA Franc (BCEAO)
1 Philippine Peso = 1.85954 Pacific Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 4.81503 Yemen Riyal
1 Philippine Peso = 0.23062 South African Rand
1 Philippine Peso = 99.99036 Zambian Kwacha
1 Philippine Peso = 6.97302 Zimbabwe dollar

Colleagues gang up on Sereno

CHIEF Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno’s colleagues in the Supreme Court have joined forces in decrying her alleged penchant for acting alone on matters that should have been decided by the 15-man Supreme Court en banc.

“The Chief Justice is not the Supreme Court,” Associate Justice Noel Tijam told the impeachment hearing of the House committee on justice chaired by Rep. Reynaldo Umali (PDP-Laban, Oriental Mindoro) yesterday.

Unlike the chief of a tribe in a community, the chief of a conglomerate, the chief of a group of companies, “the Chief Justice cannot overrule, supersede or cancel the decision of the en banc,” Tijam said.

Tijam attended the impeachment hearing with fellow Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo-De Castro who testified for the second time, and Associate Justice Francis Jardeleza.

Retired SC associate justice Arturo Brion also attended the hearing, which is in the process of determining if the impeachment complaint against Sereno has probable cause to merit a trial by the Senate.

Tijam, President Duterte’s first appointee in the High Court, testified on complainant Larry Gadon’s allegation that Sereno delayed the resolution of the urgent request of the Department of Justice (DOJ) for the transfer of cases involving Maute terrorists to courts outside Mindanao.

He confirmed Gadon’s claim that Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre’s May 29 request was not taken up in the en banc meeting last June 6 but was discussed over lunch after the session.

“The lunch is attended by the members of the court but not all members are present. I don’t know how many members were present, but there is distinct difference during the discussion in en banc session and over lunch,” he said.

Tijam denied Gadon’s claim that he was the member-in-charge “but I acted more promptly by circulating a memorandum to the en banc and trying to force a vote.”

“But the point is, regardless of the thoughts, the sentiments, the feelings of the chief justice, she should’ve  taken the initiative of bringing it to the attention of the en banc, because after all, it is the en banc that will decide on the matter,” he said.

Clerk of Court Felipa Anama earlier told the panel that the request was no longer raffled off to any member of the High Court pursuant to the rules after Sereno unilaterally assumed jurisdiction over it.

Aguirre made the urgent request last May 29 while the Supreme Court was still in recess but Sereno assumed jurisdiction over the matter on June 6.

The request was supposed to be raffled off on June 19 but was not since it was already with Sereno, who was among the three magistrates against President Duterte’s martial law declaration in Mindanao.

The SC en banc later issued a resolution on June 6 reflecting the supposed decision that was reached by the court during lunch.

“But there is distinct difference between discussing something important during the en banc session where you have the docket folders, you have the materials with you, and holding a caucus on an important matter where in front of you are forks, plates and food,” Tijam said.


De Castro said Sereno’s actions from the time that she assumed her position “showed no respect or courtesy to the court en banc.”

“On my part, I have been calling the attention of the CJ for five years now, but until now it has not stopped. Until when are we going to endure this?” she told the panel.

By the time that Sereno’s term ends in 2030, she will have served the Judiciary for 18 years – the second longest in the SC history.

Brion recalled how Sereno made it difficult for then Solicitor General Jardeleza to be included in the shortlist for SC nominees.

“I gave a very harsh judgment. It was malicious. The Chief Justice manipulated the JBC (Judicial and Bar Council) proceedings to exclude Jardeleza in what we call the JBC shortlist to be submitted to the Office of the President,” he related.

Brion said: “These small droplets (of grievances) turn into currents. These currents, in the end, turn into floods. It’s like you’re irked and annoyed at the start and it turns into anger and later on becomes hatred.”

He said “due process cannot be discretionary on the part of any instrumentality of government.”

Gadon is accusing Sereno of culpable violation of the Constitution for allegedly manipulating the shortlist of the JBC to exclude then Solicitor General Jardeleza “for personal and political reasons, thereby disgracing then Sol. Gen. Jardeleza, and curtailing the President’s power to appoint him.”

“To my mind, they are both possible and plausible,” Jardeleza said, when asked to comment on Sereno’s act.

Jardeleza said he and his fellow justices testified so “the people will have continued faith that the en banc, at least the members, and the en banc in its entirety stand for the rule of law.”

Sereno opposed Jardeleza’s nomination on integrity issues in his handling of the West Philippine Sea arbitration case.


Sereno’s camp denied she manipulated the JBC to block the nomination of Jardeleza to the High Court in 2014.

Lawyer Jojo Lacanilao, one of the spokespersons of Sereno, said Sereno was just performing her duty as a JBC member when she registered her “good faith” opposition to Jardeleza’s nomination after she evaluated and verified reports on his stand in the case filed by the Philippine government against China before the Netherlands-based Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2013.

Jardeleza was the solicitor general when the Aquino administration decided to bring China to the arbitral tribunal to challenge its excessive claims in the West Philippine Sea.

“Justice Jardeleza was excluded because he did not obtain the unanimous vote required under Section 2, Rule 10 of JBC-009,” Lacanilao said in a statement.

He said that when Sereno learned of the reports on Jardeleza’s stand on the arbitral case, it gave “her reasonable grounds to doubt his integrity and moral fitness to become a member of the highest court of the land.”

Lacanilao said Jardeleza was also given the chance to air his side when he appeared before the JBC before he was excluded from the list.

“The minutes of the executive session held on June 30, 2014 would show that then Solicitor General Jardeleza was in fact given the opportunity to explain his side, which opportunity he refused to take on account of his position that he is entitled to a statement in writing of the charges against him,” he added.

Jardeleza took his case to the SC and asked that it compel the JBC to include him in the shortlist of nominees to take over the post of retiring Associate Justice Roberto Abad. Malacañang supported Jardeleza’s bid and even filed a comment with the SC.

The SC, with seven justices voting in favor, decided to include his name in the shortlist.


De Castro said a JBC member “cannot be an oppositor and at the same time be an independent judge on the qualification of that candidate nor that of other candidates for the same post.”

“Not having inhibited from the JBC proceedings, Chief Justice Sereno acted as a complainant, prosecutor, and judge against Solicitor General Jardeleza,” De Castro said, adding that Sereno should have inhibited herself from the selection process.

Gadon said in the complaint that Sereno manipulated the JBC processes to exclude Jardeleza when she made “a last-minute objection to the inclusion of Justice Jardeleza in the list of nominees after he got the required number of votes needed to be shortlisted. Respondent Sereno questioned Justice Jardeleza’s integrity, calling into play the ‘unanimity requirement,’ i.e., the voting requirements for inclusion in the list of nominees becomes unanimous instead of the usual majority vote.”

“Not having the unanimous vote of the JBC, Justice Jardeleza was not included in the list of nominees,” the complaint said.

Jardeleza subsequently filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking to compel the JBC to include him in the list of nominees. – With Ashzel Hachero
No votes yet

Column of the Day

Hooliganism in fraternities

By DAHLI ASPILLERA | March 19,2018
‘“Frat violence--an immature useless expenditure of testosterone; a culture that retards manhood; devoid of ‘giting at dangal’ (‘valor and honor’ words in the U.P. anthem).” -- SC Justices, on frat murderers’ reclusion perpetua.’

Opinion of the Day

Best, worst places for Muslim women

By ELLEN TORDESILLAS | March 19, 2018
‘Women’s ownership of land and property is more strongly associated with a reduction in violence than employment…’