June 24, 2018, 12:52 pm
Facebook iconTwitter iconYouTube iconGoogle+ icon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06901 UAE Dirham
1 Philippine Peso = 2.02912 Albanian Lek
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03401 Neth Antilles Guilder
1 Philippine Peso = 0.5072 Argentine Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02524 Australian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03345 Aruba Florin
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03758 Barbados Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 1.57159 Bangladesh Taka
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03155 Bulgarian Lev
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00712 Bahraini Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 32.90079 Burundi Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01879 Bermuda Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02526 Brunei Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.1289 Bolivian Boliviano
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07111 Brazilian Real
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01879 Bahamian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 1.28053 Bhutan Ngultrum
1 Philippine Peso = 0.19402 Botswana Pula
1 Philippine Peso = 376.17437 Belarus Ruble
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03754 Belize Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02493 Canadian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01856 Swiss Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 11.99061 Chilean Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.12218 Chinese Yuan
1 Philippine Peso = 54.75385 Colombian Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 10.57591 Costa Rica Colon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01879 Cuban Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 1.77772 Cape Verde Escudo
1 Philippine Peso = 0.41526 Czech Koruna
1 Philippine Peso = 3.33615 Djibouti Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.12016 Danish Krone
1 Philippine Peso = 0.92728 Dominican Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 2.1963 Algerian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25225 Estonian Kroon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.33484 Egyptian Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.51146 Ethiopian Birr
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01612 Euro
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03918 Fiji Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01416 Falkland Islands Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01417 British Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.08979 Ghanaian Cedi
1 Philippine Peso = 0.87956 Gambian Dalasi
1 Philippine Peso = 169.07178 Guinea Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14072 Guatemala Quetzal
1 Philippine Peso = 3.87599 Guyana Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14741 Hong Kong Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.44878 Honduras Lempira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.11882 Croatian Kuna
1 Philippine Peso = 1.24803 Haiti Gourde
1 Philippine Peso = 5.23224 Hungarian Forint
1 Philippine Peso = 264.43067 Indonesian Rupiah
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06764 Israeli Shekel
1 Philippine Peso = 1.27568 Indian Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 22.24728 Iraqi Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 798.38407 Iran Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 2.03119 Iceland Krona
1 Philippine Peso = 2.45509 Jamaican Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01333 Jordanian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 2.06417 Japanese Yen
1 Philippine Peso = 1.89121 Kenyan Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 1.28183 Kyrgyzstan Som
1 Philippine Peso = 76.00526 Cambodia Riel
1 Philippine Peso = 7.92522 Comoros Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 16.91094 North Korean Won
1 Philippine Peso = 20.86622 Korean Won
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00568 Kuwaiti Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01541 Cayman Islands Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 6.38595 Kazakhstan Tenge
1 Philippine Peso = 158.00451 Lao Kip
1 Philippine Peso = 28.292 Lebanese Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 2.98572 Sri Lanka Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 2.74709 Liberian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25254 Lesotho Loti
1 Philippine Peso = 0.05728 Lithuanian Lita
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01166 Latvian Lat
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02548 Libyan Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.1786 Moroccan Dirham
1 Philippine Peso = 0.3177 Moldovan Leu
1 Philippine Peso = 0.98891 Macedonian Denar
1 Philippine Peso = 25.98647 Myanmar Kyat
1 Philippine Peso = 45.97896 Mongolian Tugrik
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15183 Macau Pataca
1 Philippine Peso = 6.67042 Mauritania Ougulya
1 Philippine Peso = 0.65295 Mauritius Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.29256 Maldives Rufiyaa
1 Philippine Peso = 13.4053 Malawi Kwacha
1 Philippine Peso = 0.37584 Mexican Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07518 Malaysian Ringgit
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25239 Namibian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 6.72679 Nigerian Naira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.59207 Nicaragua Cordoba
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15205 Norwegian Krone
1 Philippine Peso = 2.03401 Nepalese Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02719 New Zealand Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00723 Omani Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01879 Panama Balboa
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06134 Peruvian Nuevo Sol
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0609 Papua New Guinea Kina
1 Philippine Peso = 1 Philippine Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 2.28222 Pakistani Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06966 Polish Zloty
1 Philippine Peso = 106.55769 Paraguayan Guarani
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06839 Qatar Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07509 Romanian New Leu
1 Philippine Peso = 1.18236 Russian Rouble
1 Philippine Peso = 15.96073 Rwanda Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07046 Saudi Arabian Riyal
1 Philippine Peso = 0.1479 Solomon Islands Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25235 Seychelles Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.33738 Sudanese Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.16635 Swedish Krona
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02551 Singapore Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01417 St Helena Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.41725 Slovak Koruna
1 Philippine Peso = 149.94363 Sierra Leone Leone
1 Philippine Peso = 10.72905 Somali Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 394.98309 Sao Tome Dobra
1 Philippine Peso = 0.16441 El Salvador Colon
1 Philippine Peso = 9.67644 Syrian Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25202 Swaziland Lilageni
1 Philippine Peso = 0.61856 Thai Baht
1 Philippine Peso = 0.04882 Tunisian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.04333 Tongan paʻanga
1 Philippine Peso = 0.08786 Turkish Lira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.12682 Trinidad Tobago Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.56924 Taiwan Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 42.63435 Tanzanian Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 0.49267 Ukraine Hryvnia
1 Philippine Peso = 72.51597 Ugandan Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01879 United States Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.59451 Uruguayan New Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 147.50094 Uzbekistan Sum
1 Philippine Peso = 1499.4363 Venezuelan Bolivar
1 Philippine Peso = 430.10147 Vietnam Dong
1 Philippine Peso = 2.07159 Vanuatu Vatu
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0488 Samoa Tala
1 Philippine Peso = 10.56614 CFA Franc (BEAC)
1 Philippine Peso = 0.05073 East Caribbean Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 10.56614 CFA Franc (BCEAO)
1 Philippine Peso = 1.92165 Pacific Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 4.69466 Yemen Riyal
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25241 South African Rand
1 Philippine Peso = 97.51033 Zambian Kwacha
1 Philippine Peso = 6.80008 Zimbabwe dollar

Colleagues gang up on Sereno

CHIEF Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno’s colleagues in the Supreme Court have joined forces in decrying her alleged penchant for acting alone on matters that should have been decided by the 15-man Supreme Court en banc.

“The Chief Justice is not the Supreme Court,” Associate Justice Noel Tijam told the impeachment hearing of the House committee on justice chaired by Rep. Reynaldo Umali (PDP-Laban, Oriental Mindoro) yesterday.

Unlike the chief of a tribe in a community, the chief of a conglomerate, the chief of a group of companies, “the Chief Justice cannot overrule, supersede or cancel the decision of the en banc,” Tijam said.

Tijam attended the impeachment hearing with fellow Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo-De Castro who testified for the second time, and Associate Justice Francis Jardeleza.

Retired SC associate justice Arturo Brion also attended the hearing, which is in the process of determining if the impeachment complaint against Sereno has probable cause to merit a trial by the Senate.

Tijam, President Duterte’s first appointee in the High Court, testified on complainant Larry Gadon’s allegation that Sereno delayed the resolution of the urgent request of the Department of Justice (DOJ) for the transfer of cases involving Maute terrorists to courts outside Mindanao.

He confirmed Gadon’s claim that Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre’s May 29 request was not taken up in the en banc meeting last June 6 but was discussed over lunch after the session.

“The lunch is attended by the members of the court but not all members are present. I don’t know how many members were present, but there is distinct difference during the discussion in en banc session and over lunch,” he said.

Tijam denied Gadon’s claim that he was the member-in-charge “but I acted more promptly by circulating a memorandum to the en banc and trying to force a vote.”

“But the point is, regardless of the thoughts, the sentiments, the feelings of the chief justice, she should’ve  taken the initiative of bringing it to the attention of the en banc, because after all, it is the en banc that will decide on the matter,” he said.

Clerk of Court Felipa Anama earlier told the panel that the request was no longer raffled off to any member of the High Court pursuant to the rules after Sereno unilaterally assumed jurisdiction over it.

Aguirre made the urgent request last May 29 while the Supreme Court was still in recess but Sereno assumed jurisdiction over the matter on June 6.

The request was supposed to be raffled off on June 19 but was not since it was already with Sereno, who was among the three magistrates against President Duterte’s martial law declaration in Mindanao.

The SC en banc later issued a resolution on June 6 reflecting the supposed decision that was reached by the court during lunch.

“But there is distinct difference between discussing something important during the en banc session where you have the docket folders, you have the materials with you, and holding a caucus on an important matter where in front of you are forks, plates and food,” Tijam said.


De Castro said Sereno’s actions from the time that she assumed her position “showed no respect or courtesy to the court en banc.”

“On my part, I have been calling the attention of the CJ for five years now, but until now it has not stopped. Until when are we going to endure this?” she told the panel.

By the time that Sereno’s term ends in 2030, she will have served the Judiciary for 18 years – the second longest in the SC history.

Brion recalled how Sereno made it difficult for then Solicitor General Jardeleza to be included in the shortlist for SC nominees.

“I gave a very harsh judgment. It was malicious. The Chief Justice manipulated the JBC (Judicial and Bar Council) proceedings to exclude Jardeleza in what we call the JBC shortlist to be submitted to the Office of the President,” he related.

Brion said: “These small droplets (of grievances) turn into currents. These currents, in the end, turn into floods. It’s like you’re irked and annoyed at the start and it turns into anger and later on becomes hatred.”

He said “due process cannot be discretionary on the part of any instrumentality of government.”

Gadon is accusing Sereno of culpable violation of the Constitution for allegedly manipulating the shortlist of the JBC to exclude then Solicitor General Jardeleza “for personal and political reasons, thereby disgracing then Sol. Gen. Jardeleza, and curtailing the President’s power to appoint him.”

“To my mind, they are both possible and plausible,” Jardeleza said, when asked to comment on Sereno’s act.

Jardeleza said he and his fellow justices testified so “the people will have continued faith that the en banc, at least the members, and the en banc in its entirety stand for the rule of law.”

Sereno opposed Jardeleza’s nomination on integrity issues in his handling of the West Philippine Sea arbitration case.


Sereno’s camp denied she manipulated the JBC to block the nomination of Jardeleza to the High Court in 2014.

Lawyer Jojo Lacanilao, one of the spokespersons of Sereno, said Sereno was just performing her duty as a JBC member when she registered her “good faith” opposition to Jardeleza’s nomination after she evaluated and verified reports on his stand in the case filed by the Philippine government against China before the Netherlands-based Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2013.

Jardeleza was the solicitor general when the Aquino administration decided to bring China to the arbitral tribunal to challenge its excessive claims in the West Philippine Sea.

“Justice Jardeleza was excluded because he did not obtain the unanimous vote required under Section 2, Rule 10 of JBC-009,” Lacanilao said in a statement.

He said that when Sereno learned of the reports on Jardeleza’s stand on the arbitral case, it gave “her reasonable grounds to doubt his integrity and moral fitness to become a member of the highest court of the land.”

Lacanilao said Jardeleza was also given the chance to air his side when he appeared before the JBC before he was excluded from the list.

“The minutes of the executive session held on June 30, 2014 would show that then Solicitor General Jardeleza was in fact given the opportunity to explain his side, which opportunity he refused to take on account of his position that he is entitled to a statement in writing of the charges against him,” he added.

Jardeleza took his case to the SC and asked that it compel the JBC to include him in the shortlist of nominees to take over the post of retiring Associate Justice Roberto Abad. Malacañang supported Jardeleza’s bid and even filed a comment with the SC.

The SC, with seven justices voting in favor, decided to include his name in the shortlist.


De Castro said a JBC member “cannot be an oppositor and at the same time be an independent judge on the qualification of that candidate nor that of other candidates for the same post.”

“Not having inhibited from the JBC proceedings, Chief Justice Sereno acted as a complainant, prosecutor, and judge against Solicitor General Jardeleza,” De Castro said, adding that Sereno should have inhibited herself from the selection process.

Gadon said in the complaint that Sereno manipulated the JBC processes to exclude Jardeleza when she made “a last-minute objection to the inclusion of Justice Jardeleza in the list of nominees after he got the required number of votes needed to be shortlisted. Respondent Sereno questioned Justice Jardeleza’s integrity, calling into play the ‘unanimity requirement,’ i.e., the voting requirements for inclusion in the list of nominees becomes unanimous instead of the usual majority vote.”

“Not having the unanimous vote of the JBC, Justice Jardeleza was not included in the list of nominees,” the complaint said.

Jardeleza subsequently filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking to compel the JBC to include him in the list of nominees. – With Ashzel Hachero
No votes yet

Column of the Day

Unbridled brazenness

DODY LACUNA's picture
By DODY LACUNA | June 22,2018
‘Outrage over the killing of priests today in our country will persist and, if real justice is not served soon will, in all probability, combine for a growing social and political unrest with a polarized Church.’

Opinion of the Day

Tough days ahead

Jose Bayani Baylon's picture
By JOSE BAYANI BAYLON | June 22, 2018
‘It’s high stakes and tightrope walking that also means that a small miscalculation could upend everything.’