HE fault lies not
in the stars nor in us, but in Gloria Ar-royo for the current battered state of
Philippine democracy.
She, together with alter-superegos in her Cabinet, political
cohorts and military and police minions, have smeared the Philippine image as
the oldest democracy in Asia during her seven long years as an illegitimate
president of this country.
In the eyes of millions of Filipinos and other peoples all
over the world, Gloria Arroyo is not only the "most unpopular" but the "most
corrupt" president ever, after Marcos the "authoritarian ruler," Cory the "elite
restorationist," FVR the "military reformer," and Erap the "populist leader."
The latest big black-eye dealt Gloria Arroyo came from the
world’s leading journal on the theory and practice of democracy. In the January
2008 issue of "Journal of Democracy," Prof. Paul D. Hutchcroft of the University
of Wisconsin-Madison boldly wrote in his critique that Arroyo is responsible for
"sinking Asia’s oldest democracy into a morass of corruption and scandals."
The American savant pointed out that she found political
legitimacy elusive ever since her assumption of office through "extraordinary
means." Obviously, as we know, he was alluding to that time in 2001 when she, in
conspiracy with other overly-ambitious political cronies, opportunistic
businessmen and military generals, and the elite in high society that feared a
populist president in Joseph "Erap" Estrada, ousted Estrada from the presidency.
Most accurately, Hutchcroft traced the history of how, under
Gloria Arroyo’s watch of over seven years in Malacañang, she effectively wielded
substantial powers of the presidency to keep herself in office, and in the
process she exhibited no qualms about further undermining this country’s already
weak democratic institutions. And he lamented the fact that this country has
suffered one political crisis after another that increasingly imperiled its
longstanding democratic structures.
Not surprisingly, the stinging critique by the American
political scientist came quite close on the heels of another rebuke of Gloria
Arroyo by the Freedom House. The influential US-based democracy watchdog
downgraded the Philippines from the list of the world’s working and fully-free
democracies. It took notice of the over 800 unsolved and unexplained political
killings of lawyers, priests, activists, and journalists, all which have been
attributed to Arroyo’s military and police agencies. This, too, was mentioned in
the "Journal of democracy."
Oh, by the way, these American watchdogs of democracy are not
the only ones who have seen and written about the grave crimes of Gloria Arroyo
and political and military minions who have undermined democratic rights and
institutions. Filipinos, too, have not just stand silent about the innumerable
grievous wrongdoings in her government.
Just the other day, over a hundred journalists, both from the
print and broadcast media, called the attention of the Supreme Court to the
blatant violations of civil liberties of the people, including freedom of
information and freedom of the press.
They petitioned the tribunal to stop the repeated threats and
attempts of Arroyo’s storm troopers-like police and military men to "harass and
intimidate" journalists.
"We are taking the legal high road," their spokesperson told
the highest magistrates of the land, "because we believe we either have press
freedom or we don’t. There is no middle ground!
"Our objective is not just relief, but for the Supreme Court
to help correct the current situation where, we believe, press freedom is being
constantly redefined and constrained" by the Arroyo administration."
Yes, indeed, as the "Journal of Democracy" very well put it,
these assaults on the media members and killings of journalists "must be viewed
as an attack on one of the major bulwarks of Philippine democracy."
It is our fervent hope that the high tribunal would uphold our Constitutional
rights of free expression and of free press. And ultimately, put an end to the
despicable abuses, the lawless acts of an illegitimate president in the name of
her phony democracy.