was glued to my
television set till almost 2 a.m. yesterday, watching events unfold at the House
of Representatives following weeks of rumors of a leadership change.
And what I saw left me with a simple conclusion: The pot was
calling the kettle black. Over and over again those of us who followed the drama
could only watch in amazement – definitely not in awe – as dirty linen was
(partially) exposed to the public, and veiled threats and allegations hurled by
the contending forces.
There were moments of elation – I enjoyed listening to Rep.
Lani Cayetano explain her vote (and thinking that she is a much better speaker,
at least in Filipino, than her husband, Sen. Alan) and moments of irritation. I
thought Rep. Erin Tañada was way off the mark when he was telling Korina Sanchez
that the leadership fight in the Lower House had no impact or bearing on the
rest of us because it was a simple internal issue to the House and no
legislation was at issue. But overall, the spectacle left me watching with my
mouth open, sometimes causing me to shake my head, but usually feeling let down
that these are the types of representatives we have, representatives who are but
mirror images of who we are as a people. Tal pueblo tal gobierno!
But before the spectacle of factions of our political elite
accusing each other of betraying the people could cause me to descend into some
depression as the clock struck close to midnight, a flash of insight made my
day. What was transpiring before my very eyes – and before the very eyes of
millions of viewers of ANC – was the very best argument against any attempt by
anyone to take our current Constitution, re-write it, and rewrite it in a way
that all we will have is a unicameral legislature with the very same people who
were showing us how deeply unqualified most of them are to be even called
"Honorable"!
What a cause for celebration!
In fact, if only I were active in a group that is intent on
campaigning against any move to change the charter, I would go to ANC and buy
clips of each and every session of the House that reveals how self-centered, how
undisciplined, how shallow and how silly many of our representatives are.
I would then piece these clips together into, say, an MTV,
add to it a catchy jingle, and go to town with it addressing specially the youth
of today who can be so susceptible to the trappings of trapo politics. And I
will pose a couple of questions:
Are these the men and women you wish to see comprising the
one and only House of the proposed unicameral legislature?
Are these the values – see no evil, hear no evil, speak no
evil – we wish to see upheld by successive leaders of our legislature – values
they uphold at least until their hold on power is threatened?
Are these the men and women who truly deserve the honorific
"Honorable"? Or must we turn to Webster and request for a review of the meaning
of the word? Or consider the "Honorable" honorific to actually be a pejorative
term, at least when used in the Philippine context?
Over and over we heard representative after representative
mouth the word "reform," but are they truly the men and women who can and who
will bring the reform that is much needed by our society? I posit that an honest
"examination of conscience" will leave very few Filipinos answering in the
affirmative.
One of those present at the House that night sent me a text,
asking me if what was transpiring on national television made me happy. Yes and
No, was my response. No because the revelations of the Speaker would forever be
tainted by his timing, and Yes because at the very least some of the truth which
our political elite try to hide from the rest of us is revealed every time
factions among our elite fight.
Or I may have answered as the Germans would answer: Gut, aber
gut ist uns nicht gut genug. Good, but good is not just good enough.
Let’s see how far the new leaders of the House go with
reform.
Maybe the most valuable result from what transpired the other
night at the House is the emergence of a now valid question: if we are to
abolish one House, shouldn’t it be the Lower one? And to this question my
response is a simple YES, with a simple reason: if there were one or two or
three representatives that night whose reasoning you or I could not stomach, you
or I could not do anything in return because that representative most probably
wasn’t the representative of our District.
But senators represent all of us – and whether we live in the
hovels of Makati or the big family clusters of Tondo, you and I could vote for,
or vote against, a senator who stands up, takes the microphone, and leaves us
either staring in awe or staring in disgust.
Now isn’t that more in keeping with giving real power to the
people?
Abolish one House? Now I am ready to answer "Sure".
Let’s go Unicameral: Abolish the Lower House.
Now that would be a major cause for celebration!