WEDNESDAY |FEBRUARY 15, 2008| PHILIPPINES

ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | WRITE US | ADVERTISE | ARCHIVES

 

Reporters' TRO petition
against arrest denied


JOURNALISTS who filed a P10-million class suit against the government suffered a legal setback on Thursday after the Makati regional trial court Branch 56 denied their petition for a new temporary restraining order (TRO) prohibiting the arrests of media persons covering incidents such as the Nov. 29 standoff at the Manila Peninsula Hotel.

Makati RTC Judge Reynaldo Laigo said the government's advisory warning journalists of arrest and criminal liability if they hinder police and military operations does not constitute a threat that would prevent them from doing their jobs.

"The plaintiffs have failed to show the existence of a right which stands to be violated should the court not yield their application for a TRO," Laigo said in his six-page ruling. "It is a rule that injunctive relief such as the TRO may be resorted to in order to protect or preserve the rights of a litigant during the pendency of the principal actions. However, before an injunctive writ can be issued, it is essential to show the existence of a right to be protected."

The plaintiff-journalists, who were among those arrested during the police assault on the Makati hotel, requested for the extension of the 72-hour TRO Executive Judge Winlove Dumayas issued last Jan. 28, citing the continued threats against their right to freedom of speech.

The journalists particularly cited the Dec. 11 advisory of Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez warning reporters that they would be arrested if they ignore authorities' orders during a crisis situation.

But the Makati court said the respondents' public pronouncements are just a reminder of or congruous with the prevailing provisions of Article 151 of the Revised Penal Code on resistance and defiance of authorities.

Laigo said this law also applies to members of the press and that such public pronouncements do not specifically curtail the press' freedom of speech. "It must be stressed that there is nothing therein which would in effect bar or forbid the plaintiffs from freely discharging their usual tasks as such members of the press, by covering and making reports on any incidents akin to that of Manila Pen standoff that paved the way for defendants' having issued those public pronouncements, that may occur in the future involving massive police or military operations," the court ruled.

The court will rule on the journalists' application for a writ of preliminary injunction on Feb. 20.

Named respondents in the class suit, aside from Gonzalez, were Interior Secretary Ronaldo Puno, Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro, AFP chief Hermogenes Esperon, PNP chief Avelino Razon and other police officials. - Ashzel Hachero

 


     METRO NEWS
Reporters' TRO petition against arrest denied

Ermita reroutes Cuerpo appeal for intervention to DILG

$4 million in illegally mined nickel ore seized in Zambales

Pampanga gov asks SC to stop recount


    
     TOP NEWS

PSG team presence uncovered

Gloria cancels PMA appearance on assassination threat

'Sobra na, Tama na'

Nograles caught in GMA-JDV crossfire

'Special permission' required for US gov't men going South

CA: Lozada may no longer need protection

ZTE threatens to sue corruption accusers




Please address comments and suggestions to the Webmaster.
COPYRIGHT 2004 © People's Independent Media Inc.