HE Jun Lozada
kidnapping caper – specifically the one that began with him being taken from the
airport via its backdoor to places where he could have easily been liquidated –
only serves to cement our reputation as a country whose airports do not deserve
the highest of ratings from international civil aviation authorities.
How else do you expect the rest of the world to react upon
hearing Lozada’s story, and tying that in to Ninoy’s own, 25 years ago, which
resulted in his assassination at the tarmac?
Add to that the bumbling attempts by the people supposedly in
charge of the airport – from the NAIA general manager to the security chief – to
explain away what happened under their very noses?
And add to that still the crumbling facilities, the silly
procedures, the "palakasan" system and what have you got? An airport that even
Filipinos themselves would consider one of the worst (if not in fact the worst)
in the world.
In other countries this would have been enough for the people
in charge to have resigned, out of a sense of self-respect. Here, as usual, they
hang on to power and position.
No shame.
The idiocy of the whole airport authority, including the
security system, is shown even when passengers are asked to remove not only
their shoes or their belts, but even their watches. In Manila they ask you to do
this sometimes; in Davao they require you to do this.
And why, I asked?
Because, I was told, the watches would set off the metal
detectors.
Half pissed-off and half amused, I asked the security man:
But why don’t they let me take off my watch in a place like Hong Kong? Or
Incheon, South Korea? To which I get the same reply: "Well, because here the
metal detector will be set off by the wristwatches."
And then I press, the naughty boy in me at work: "Why should
the metal detector here be set off but not in Hong Kong or Seoul or Atlanta?" To
which I get an exasperated reply: "Well, we are only after your safety!".
But here is the idiotic part: I was carrying a laptop, and no
one asked me to take it out of my bag to be X-rayed independently. Some stupid
security guy somewhere in our airport security hierarchy believes it important
to ask passengers to take off their wristwatches – which is not a widespread
practice all over the world – and yet does not require passengers to take out
their laptops which IS a widespread practice!
Idiots.
The reason why we get bad marks in the eyes of the world is
because we deserve it. We have stupid security procedures as detailed above, and
we have stupid "sundo" procedures that allow the Jun Lozadas of this world to be
taken down stairways and out via waiting cars. Not to mention "welcomers" who
will "facilitate" your passage through Customs and Immigration so that, as in
the case of Virgilio Garcillano, there is even no record of your departure or
arrival!
We deserve the bad marks.
Here’s what makes me feel even more incensed.
Our government officials – surely even those in charge of
airports – travel often. They should – if they are conscientious with their work
– use their travel opportunities to observe what is done or not done in other
airports. That’s the point I raised about using the snaking lines at Immigration
counters, and I was glad to notice that PAL at the check-in counters at Mactan
last Monday morning was itself using the snaking lines for check-in for their
Fiesta class passengers. Yet it doesn’t seem evident that our traveling
officials learn anything from their travels. Even in that aspect, we, the
Filipino people who foot their bill, are denied the least of "pasalubongs".
And speaking of airports and X-ray machines, I still haven’t
forgotten the fact that Thailand uncovered a corruption scandal involving the
sale of X-ray machines to their airport authorities. The supplier paid bribes to
government officials to get the contract, but was discovered because its pricing
was quite high to make up for the bribes.
Guess what? In the investigation conducted by Thai and US
authorities, it was discovered that this same supplier actually bagged contracts
in two other Asian countries: China was one, and I guess you can guess what the
third country was!
Has anyone ever tried investigating the airport scanner
machines supply contract for the Philippines?
We totally deserve our shoddy international reputation.
***
Greetings to the crew of PR 844 that left Cebu at 6:45 a.m.
Feb. 13. We arrived a bit early at the Centennial Terminal, and as a result were
penalized by having to wait until the gate we were supposed to use was vacated
by another aircraft.
Anyway, service was excellent and efficient and the crew and
staff had the usual smiling faces that balances off whatever pagkukulang PAL has
in other respects. I am looking forward to PAL’s major aircraft rehabilitation
program that will result in bi-class flights and more legroom in Mabuhay.
Here’s to a much better and more deservedly positive reputation for the flag
carrier.