HE sad thing about
the aborted National Broad band Network (NBN) project is that it is one of those
really necessary endeavors that got mired in accusations of greed and
overpricing. What is now sad about the ongoing Senate investigation about the
NBN deal is that it has appeared to have been sidetracked by the issue of the
alleged cover-up in the wake of the return of now star witness Rodolfo Lozada
Jr.
Such squid tactics may actually favor the administration.
These certainly prevent the Senate and the rest of the country from getting to
the bottom of the US$329 million controversial project.
First of all, we find former socio-economic czar Romulo Neri
trying his very best to keep from testifying further in the Senate about the NBN
deal. Not that his silence is propping up the government’s credibility. Surely
not after Neri previously admitted under oath that alleged deal broker and
former poll chief Benjamin Abalos told him he had two hundred million big ones
coming just to approve the deal. That point is being corroborated by Lozada.
Neri even went to the extent of playing an adult version of "cops and robbers"
with the Senate over the arrest warrant issued against him for refusing to
testify and only surfaced after getting a status quo order from the Supreme
Court.
Now comes Environment Secretary Joselito Atienza, Lozada’s
boss, actually testifying with gusto before the Senate hearing. Not just Atienza
but also a host of other top-rank government officials. They collectively
decided to waive the supposed protection of the much-hated Executive Order No.
464, which was totally out of character for this administration’s officialdom.
Tempting as it is to think that at least some of the
President’s men suddenly sprouted a conscience overnight, it hardly seems to be
the case here. While Neri can only testify on the hard facts of the NBN project,
Atienza and his horde can only talk about the obvious cover-up in the case,
betting their credibility against Lozada’s in a bid to muddle the issue.
That seems to be focus of this administration and the
principals in the deal – muddling the issue – to hide the real hard facts that
will betray whether the NBN deal is grossly overpriced
Then there is the government announcing that there are death
threats against Arroyo, which is equally strange since I was under the
impression heads of state eat death threats for breakfast. That is why we have
the Presidential Security Group, is it not? If the objective is to turn it into
a death threat contest between Arroyo and Lozada, forget it. I do not think
anyone will believe that Arroyo will be the whistleblower to the mega-billion
anomalies in her administration.
Even Abalos himself has gotten into the "death threat"
contest arguing that Lozada’s frequent presence at the Wack-Wack Golf Club does
not support Lozada’s claims that he is a marked man. That brings up a very
interesting point: Why was Abalos frequently at the golf club himself as if his
duties then as poll chief left him with little time for anything else?
What we need to know about the whole deal is whether it was
overpriced and, if true, by how much? The Senate should focus on this question.
All it entails is asking what hardware, training and other support services we
are getting exactly for the US$329 million loan from China. But it seems this
administration does not want this question answered thoroughly.
ZTE Corp., the company in the middle of it all, may be right when it branded
the Senate hearing as a political circus. Except that the ringmaster is not in
the Senate but in Malacañang.