f Malacañang’s
spokespersons are to be believed, Rodolfo Noel "Jun" Lozada would rank as one of
the greatest showmen in recent history. His histrionics – tears, laughter and
other "pa-awa" effects – are calculated, the spokespersons insist, to win the
public’s sympathy to what they say is the pack of lies and half-truths that he
is so ably peddling.
Why would Lozada be peddling lies? Maybe because of a deal
gone wrong, or a disagreement on the sharing of the "loot"? Frankly, his
possible motivation has not been made clear to us. But we are made to believe
that the Lozada tales – tall tales, mind you – are now part and parcel of a
bigger story, the continuing attempt to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the
government of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo which includes attempts to revive issues
that are already old, dead and buried.
Unfortunately, the public does not seem to buy this line from
Malacañang. He is the wrong Lozada – much thinner, for one – than the Lozada who
was into the entertainment scene. And even if Rodolfo Noel’s nickname had been
Ike, we must remember that it was not Ike but Kuya Germs who was – still is, I
believe – owner of the honorific "Master Showman".
Nope, I don’t think the public believes Jun Lozada is a
showman, much less a master showman. I believe that what the public believes is
that Lozada is one guy – albeit not as pure as a saint – who finally has found
the guts to tell the truth because keeping the truth hidden and hiding behind
lie after lie has become too hard to do. When so many people still find it
convenient to be part of a show – a show of smoke and mirrors – Lozada opted
out. And despite all the hardship he has had to bear for that choice – like
feeling the whole weight of government upon you – he has chosen to stay the
course.
That’s not master showmanship in the eyes of many of his
countrymen. That’s master patriotism.
I was one of the millions who watched Lozada in the "Harapan"
program that ABS-CBN set up two night ago, and while I thought the format was a
bit odd, I also thought it worked to Lozada’s advantage.
Like most of those who became guests on the show I expected
the program to simply be a face to face confrontation between Lozada and former
Comelec chief Benjamin Abalos. But it turned out to be a 1-vs-3 or 4 for 2/3 of
the program, specially when arrayed against Lozada were Abalos, PNP chief
Avelino Razon, Malacañang deputy spokesman Dr. Tony Golez, and DOTC Assistant
Secretary Lorenzo Formoso.
I thought that stacked the deck against Lozada, who had to
face so many individuals out to call him a liar, but somehow not only did he
survive – he seemed to have gotten the better of most of the administration’s
people, most of all Abalos.
It also didn’t help Abalos’ case that he came with a lawyer,
and a handful of documents that became convenient when he didn’t want to
directly answer the question posed. Such as this, from Korina Sanchez: Are you
gentlemen willing to undergo a lie detector test?
Lozada grudgingly agreed, saying he would do so if that is
what it took to write finis to all of these; Abalos not only evaded the
question, he was even heard off-cam inquiring in Filipino, "that isn’t
admissible in court, is it?".
Last Sunday, surveying all of those who had gathered at the
gym at La Salle Greenhills, I could not escape the feeling that that off-course
drift is slowly coming to an end. The people who gathered for the mass for Jun
Lozada were from all walks of life: Cory and members of her Cabinet; priests and
nuns and scholastics; fathers and mothers and brothers and sisters; there was
even a brave young man sitting in a wheelchair and attached to some breathing
apparatus. There was applause at certain parts of the homily; even bigger
applause earlier when first Cory, then Joey de Venecia, and finally Jun Lozada
entered the gym. And not many eyebrows from my friends in the Left were raised
when the congregation broke out into "Bayan Ko" accompanied by raised fists – a
sight once only limited to rallies by the students of UP but now apparently part
and parcel of even the rallies and prayers of the upper strata of society.
Were all of these possible because Jun Lozada is, as the
Palace insists, a "master showman"? Or were these happening because of Jun
Lozada, a mere mortal who had preferred to run away but whom circumstances had
been forced to own up to the truth?
In my own assessment, all of these would not be happening
today if Palace officials had not mishandled the case of Jun Lozada – from the
time they conspired to have him leave for Hong Kong to avoid appearing before
the Senate, to the time they compounded this mistake with that confused
kidnapping-cum-protection caper upon his arrival.
Or maybe we should in fact look further back to be more
accurate: all of these would not be happening today if only there was no past to
come back to haunt the residents of the Palace – because more and more it
appears undeniable that the whole Lozada-ZTE-Abalos-FG caper is linked to the
GMA-Garci-Abalos-2004 elections caper, which in turn is linked to the
Erap-Chavit-Edsa 2 caper that swept GMA into office. The bottom line is this:
GMA wouldn’t be in the dire straits she is in today if she only had stuck to the
values and principles she had enunciated that heady noon when she took her oath
of office as president of the Philippines.
A simple re-read of her 2001 inaugural address will make it
stark how far off course she had drifted, bringing along the rest of us with
her.
That is, until Jun Lozada created a break in the cycle of
lies and deception that seems to have enveloped this administration from the
very first day of its existence.
The work of a master showman? I don’t think so. I think it is more like the
unintended consequences of the words and deeds of a man who had to master his
own fears in order to survive.