SEN. Joker Arroyo yesterday twitted President
Arroyo for creating a legal team to study the possibility of
revoking Executive Order 464, saying the team's members "are the
very same officials who have been misinterpreting the Supreme
Court ruling" on the order.
"What is there to revoke, or to study, or to
revisit, or to re-examine in EO 464?" Senator Arroyo said,
saying that the Supreme Court has already laid down the
parameters of what the Executive and Congress can and cannot do
on congressional investigations.
The Supreme Court has ruled as
unconstitutional portions of EO 464 which required key officials
to seek permission of the President before attending legislative
inquiries. But the tribunal upheld the right of Cabinet members
to invoke executive privilege when called before the legislature
on issues that could jeopardize national security and diplomatic
relations.
Executive privilege is being invoked by,
among other officials, Romulo Neri, acting chairman of the
Commission on Higher Education and former chairman of the
National Economic Development Authority. Neri has been refusing
to appear again at the Senate which is investigating the alleged
anomalous national broadband network project.
The members are Justice Secretary Raul
Gonzalez, Solicitor General Agnes Devanadera, chief presidential
legal counsel Sergio Apostol, deputy executive secretary for
legal matters Manuel Gaite, and government corporate counsel
Alberto Agra.
The President created the team following the
call of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines for
Arroyo not to prevent her officials from testifying on the
alleged anomalies in the NBN deal, particularly by removing
impediments such as EO 464.
Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita said the
team would submit its recommendations to the President next
week.
Senator Arroyo said there would be no problem
if both Malacañang and the Senate would follow what the Supreme
Court said of E0 464.
"Unfortunately, both sides are engaged in a
battle not for good governance but for political supremacy, and
the Supreme Court is becoming the naive victim of this power
play and being baited to respond to every disagreement between
the two political departments of government," he said.
He said that at this point, it is no big deal
for the team members "to conveniently reverse themselves to make
the President look good."
"And supposing the Executive capitulates on
EO 464, will the Senate tri-committees put a closure to the
investigation? No, it will continue and prolong the
investigation indefinitely under the guise that it will not stop
until it finds the eternal truth which even courts find
difficult to achieve," he said.
Sen. Mar Roxas said the President can save
the Republic, the institution of the presidency, and the country
from "institutional crisis" by lifting EO 464.
He said the President should also instruct
all her officials to attend investigations. If they refused to
attend, the President should suspend them, he said.
"Our country is broken. The institutions have
low credibility. The executive itself has low respect from the
people. And we need to fix this. Ang ating mga kababayan, yung
tiwala nila sa ating pamahalaan, sa ating mag opisyales ay
mababang-mababa na o kaya wala na," he said.
Election lawyer Romulo Macalintal said
scrapping EO 464 would be futile as the executive privilege of a
President is embedded in the 1987 Constitution.
Macalintal said "executive privilege" as
defined by the Supreme Court in its ruling in Senate vs Ermita
is "the power of the government and the right of a president to
withhold information form Congress, the courts and ultimately
the public."
"Abolition of EO 464 will not diminish a president's right to
exercise his executive privilege which exempts him or his
Cabinet members from testifying in Congress without his
consent," he said. - JP Lopez and Jocelyn Montemayor