he Department of
Health and its partner agencies deserve credit for the fact that the casualty
toll from fire-crackers and other exploding celebratory devices last New Year’s
Eve was one of the lowest in years. However, health promotion advocates will not
ever be satisfied with this accomplishment. After all, they remember that there
was one New Year’s Eve when emergency rooms throughout the country reported zero
explosives injury; that was on the eve of the New Year of 1973 immediately
following the proclamation of martial law.
Nevertheless, it was pleasantly unusual to walk subdivision
streets early in the morning of January 1st with the air free of its old smokey
haze and, except for a few spots where recalcitrant pyromaniacs still used
fireworks, the sidewalks and streets free of the debris of firecrackers and "kwitis".
It seems that 14 years later, the famous Flavier "Torotot"
campaign may finally be working.
***
The Congress has given the Filipino people a welcome
Christmas present in the form of legislation that will help to halt the
increasing prices of medicines. Although the Senate had easily passed its
version of the "Affordable Medicines Bill", the House version, labeled the
"Cheaper Medicines Bill" had some stormy moments and barely squeaked through
before the Christmas break.
The bicameral negotiations to reconcile the two versions
promise to be, at the very least, quite interesting. There are several
contentious points marking the differences between them.
The House bill mandates the creation of a "Drug Price
Regulatory Board" to ensure that prices of essential medicines are not allowed
to exceed maximum limits to be set by government. This notion is anathema to
free-market advocates who are fairly well represented in the Senate. A
compromise version of this proposal may well be an appropriate solution to what
could be an impasse that could frustrate cheaper medicine proponents.
While price control may be the most high-profile issue, there
are a number of other differences that may well further delay the law’s passage.
There were a number of attempts in the lower House to dilute some of the
intellectual property provisions of the Senate bill.
For example, there was strong criticism of the provision that
would prevent patent-holding multinational companies from using minor chemical
alterations to extend a drug’s patent monopoly period (also known as
"ever-greening"). If any of the "anti-ever-greening" provisions are diluted, the
intellectual property revision would be so badly flawed as to allow global
pharmaceutical giants to maintain hegemony over vulnerable markets like the
Philippines.
One point that may attract dissent from some quarters of the
medical profession is the provision intended to strengthen the Generics Law of
1988. The article prohibits the inclusion of brand names in medical
prescriptions altogether. The more conservative older practitioners have raised
an old argument that emphasizes the notion of physicians’ sole prerogative to
decide what medicines his patients take.
Many younger doctors, trained in the post-Generic era, may
find this notion rather quaint and not in keeping with the times of
patient-centered team approaches to health care. Nevertheless, their more senior
colleagues do have a point when they argue that there may be issues of patient
safety if safeguards at drugstore level are not put in place by government
regulatory bodies. In any case, most advocates of generic drug use believe that
the strengthened provision, if it remains, should be the subject of intensive
stakeholder discussions during the preparation of the implementing rules and
regulations.
***
The General Appropriations Act is another possible bone of
contention in the bicameral discussions The House proposal includes a major
increase in social expenditures including the budget of the Department of
Health. One danger is that the bulk of these increases will again go to
expensive curative fixtures such as retained hospitals. Of particular public
health interest is the proposed P1 billion budget for tuberculosis control – a
critical measure if the Philippines is to be weaned from donor-dependency in its
major public health programs.
However, in the end, implementation of whatever budget
Congress approves is the responsibility of the sitting administration.
Population and development advocates are still dismayed by the fact that P180
million appropriated for the purchase of contraceptive materials and supplies
was never even considered for release by Malacañang – this, despite efforts of
the DOH to satisfy the palace’s stringent conditionalities.
***
The first Rafael M. Salas Golf Cup will be launched on January 17, 2008 at
the Eagle Ridge Golf and Country Club, General Trias Cavite, with former
President Fidel V. Ramos leading some of the nation’s most avid golfers. The
tournament is for the benefit of the advocacy group, the Philippine Forum for
Population and Development.