WEDNESDAY |JANUARY 9, 2008 | PHILIPPINES

ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | WRITE US | ADVERTISE | ARCHIVES

 

 

‘It seems that 14 years later, the famous Flavier “Torotot” campaign may finally be working.’

Health
views, news


 

The Department of Health and its partner agencies deserve credit for the fact that the casualty toll from fire-crackers and other exploding celebratory devices last New Year’s Eve was one of the lowest in years. However, health promotion advocates will not ever be satisfied with this accomplishment. After all, they remember that there was one New Year’s Eve when emergency rooms throughout the country reported zero explosives injury; that was on the eve of the New Year of 1973 immediately following the proclamation of martial law.

Nevertheless, it was pleasantly unusual to walk subdivision streets early in the morning of January 1st with the air free of its old smokey haze and, except for a few spots where recalcitrant pyromaniacs still used fireworks, the sidewalks and streets free of the debris of firecrackers and "kwitis".

It seems that 14 years later, the famous Flavier "Torotot" campaign may finally be working.

***

The Congress has given the Filipino people a welcome Christmas present in the form of legislation that will help to halt the increasing prices of medicines. Although the Senate had easily passed its version of the "Affordable Medicines Bill", the House version, labeled the "Cheaper Medicines Bill" had some stormy moments and barely squeaked through before the Christmas break.

The bicameral negotiations to reconcile the two versions promise to be, at the very least, quite interesting. There are several contentious points marking the differences between them.

The House bill mandates the creation of a "Drug Price Regulatory Board" to ensure that prices of essential medicines are not allowed to exceed maximum limits to be set by government. This notion is anathema to free-market advocates who are fairly well represented in the Senate. A compromise version of this proposal may well be an appropriate solution to what could be an impasse that could frustrate cheaper medicine proponents.

While price control may be the most high-profile issue, there are a number of other differences that may well further delay the law’s passage. There were a number of attempts in the lower House to dilute some of the intellectual property provisions of the Senate bill.

For example, there was strong criticism of the provision that would prevent patent-holding multinational companies from using minor chemical alterations to extend a drug’s patent monopoly period (also known as "ever-greening"). If any of the "anti-ever-greening" provisions are diluted, the intellectual property revision would be so badly flawed as to allow global pharmaceutical giants to maintain hegemony over vulnerable markets like the Philippines.

One point that may attract dissent from some quarters of the medical profession is the provision intended to strengthen the Generics Law of 1988. The article prohibits the inclusion of brand names in medical prescriptions altogether. The more conservative older practitioners have raised an old argument that emphasizes the notion of physicians’ sole prerogative to decide what medicines his patients take.

Many younger doctors, trained in the post-Generic era, may find this notion rather quaint and not in keeping with the times of patient-centered team approaches to health care. Nevertheless, their more senior colleagues do have a point when they argue that there may be issues of patient safety if safeguards at drugstore level are not put in place by government regulatory bodies. In any case, most advocates of generic drug use believe that the strengthened provision, if it remains, should be the subject of intensive stakeholder discussions during the preparation of the implementing rules and regulations.

***

The General Appropriations Act is another possible bone of contention in the bicameral discussions The House proposal includes a major increase in social expenditures including the budget of the Department of Health. One danger is that the bulk of these increases will again go to expensive curative fixtures such as retained hospitals. Of particular public health interest is the proposed P1 billion budget for tuberculosis control – a critical measure if the Philippines is to be weaned from donor-dependency in its major public health programs.

However, in the end, implementation of whatever budget Congress approves is the responsibility of the sitting administration. Population and development advocates are still dismayed by the fact that P180 million appropriated for the purchase of contraceptive materials and supplies was never even considered for release by Malacañang – this, despite efforts of the DOH to satisfy the palace’s stringent conditionalities.

***

The first Rafael M. Salas Golf Cup will be launched on January 17, 2008 at the Eagle Ridge Golf and Country Club, General Trias Cavite, with former President Fidel V. Ramos leading some of the nation’s most avid golfers. The tournament is for the benefit of the advocacy group, the Philippine Forum for Population and Development.


Email address: quasir@mozcom.com

 




















Please address comments and suggestions to the Webmaster.
COPYRIGHT 2004 © People's Independent Media Inc.