HAT should be
viewed as an act of magnanimity, in fact, raises more questions than ever. The
latest announcement that major oil players in the country are cutting diesel
prices by P1.50 per liter, by "request" of Malacañang and not by the favor
dispensers, makes the public wonder if there is any sense at all to the
Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act or R.A. 8479.
Following a sudden P3 per liter increase, the highest in the
recent wave of rate spikes that has brought diesel prices almost at par with
gasoline, it does not make sense. According to Press Secretary Jesus Dureza, the
oil firms agreed to reduce diesel prices to give the public relief.
It does not make sense. Why torture us with a P3 per liter
rate hike in the first place only to immediately slash it in half just to give
us a small measure of respite? Not unless the guys running the local oil
companies have a bad sense of humor.
It does not make sense either that the move was a response to
the administration's appeal too the private oil companies to lower diesel
prices, as claimed by Dureza. The whole point of the Oil Industry Deregulation
Law is to make the industry more attuned to market forces. Certainly, political
and public sensitivities play no part in that. If they did, why not appeal to
bring down to pre-crisis levels?
Even Petron Corp., the dominant industry player, said as much
when its spokesperson, Virginia Ruivivar, admitted that while they gave in to
the request of the Palace, the firm will have to recover this eventually. More
likely sooner than later.
I will give credit to Dureza though when he said that the
move has nothing to do with the -38 net satisfaction rating of Mrs. Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo, according to the latest survey conducted by the Social Weather
Station. Not because as Dureza claims that Mrs. Arroyo "irrespective of whether
she is popular or unpopular, will do what is right to the nation.knowing the
President this is a continuing day to day focus by her on how to be able to
really help mitigate the adverse effects of the global phenomenon like this (oil
price increases)." But, quite simply, because there is no chief executive or
government, for that matter, that is bigger and more powerful than free market
forces.
That is the problem with trying to hitch one's wagon to the
supposed train of economic success we have experienced. Having claimed credit
for everything when the times were supposedly good, now that the economy is
sinking it is the time for retribution. And, no amount of trying to appear firm,
resolute and statesman-like will ever cure the public relations disaster that is
underway.
If at all, Malacañang should take the opportunity to review
the successes and failures of the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Law since
the measure was touted as one that would bring pump prices down. Malacañang
should not find this difficult since Mrs. Arroyo herself played a key role in
crafting this piece of legislation as a senator.
To be sure, what the law covers is the downstream side of the
industry. If the cost of having the oil gush out of the well is US$150 per
barrel, there is not much that the law can do about that. But still, now is the
time to ask if the law actually spurred the entry of new investments or players
to contest the dominance of the three major players that lord it over the local
market.
Equally important, this is also an opportunity for the government to reassess
its own addiction for oil price hikes since these also increases its own direct
tax take on oil products through the Value-Added Tax (VAT). For certain, the
government will not admit it has any such addiction. No addict will ever admit
to having that kind of a problem. But now would be a good time for the
government to voluntarily go into VAT-rehab, so to speak. At least for petroleum
products.