BY EVANGELINE DE VERA
THE Supreme Court yesterday ordered the
Bureau of Internal Revenue to refund P1 billion in overpaid
excise taxes of Fortune Tobacco from its eight cigarette
brands manufactured between 2000 and 2002.
In a 26-page decision penned by Associate
Justice Dante Tinga, the SC’s Second Division affirmed the
findings of the Court of Appeals and Court of Tax Appeals that
the CA and CTA merely followed the law when they ruled that
the basis for the 12 percent increase in the tax rate should
be the net retail price of the cigarettes as outlined in the
Tax Code.
This provision states that the
classification of each brand of cigarettes based on its
average net retail price as of Oct. 1, 1996, shall remain in
force until revised by Congress.
The SC said the CTA was correct in
declaring null Revenue Regulation 17-99 (RR 17-99increasing
the tax rates imposed on cigars and cigarettes, saying the
revenue officials appeared to have ventured into "unauthorized
administrative legislation."
The SC likewise dismissed the contention of
the BIR that a tax refund partakes the nature of a tax
exemption and does not apply to the tax refund, which Fortune
Tobacco sought.
The high court said there is parity between
tax refund and tax exemption only when the former is based
either on a tax exemption statute or a tax refund statute.
"Obviously that is not the situation here.
Quite the contrary, Fortune Tobacco’s claim for refund is
premised on its erroneous payment of the tax, or better still,
the government’s exaction in the absence of a law," the SC
said.
The BIR had questioned the decision of the
CTA to grant a refund of P680.387 million and P355.385 million
in taxes collected from Jan. 1, 2000 to Dec. 31, 2002 from
Fortune Tobacco’s products.
For the period covering Jan. 1-31, 2000,
Fortune claimed to have paid P585 million in specific tax for
its brands.
On Feb. 7, 2000, Fortune filed with the CTA
a claim for refund of overpaid excise tax for the month of
January 2000 in the amount of P356 million.
The BIR then filed an appeal with the CTA
saying the refund claimed was not properly documented, but the
tax court junked the suit.
The CTA later on also granted Fortune’s
additional claim of P680.387 million in tax refund.
An appeal by the BIR before the CA later consolidated the
two cases into one, which was subsequently denied by the
appellate court, prompting them to elevate the case before the
SC.