THE Court of Appeals has dismissed the
petition for habeas corpus filed by the mother of missing
activist Jonas Joseph Burgos against Army personnel, but
partially granted her petition for amparo for authorities to
continuously investigate Jonas’ disappearance.
The Burgos family is suspecting the military
to be behind Jonas’ abduction in April last year in a mall in
Quezon City. It linked the military through a license plate seen
on one of the vehicles of the abductors, which was originally
attached to a vehicle which was impounded at the camp of the
56th Infantry Battalion in Bulacan about a year before the
abduction.
In a 50-page decision, the CA said Burgos
failed to sufficiently prove that the military was behind the
abduction.
"We have meticulously perused the evidence
but found it wanting to establish the claimed direct connection
between the abductors of Jonas and the military… The evidence
does not also show whether the abductors are members of the
military or the police or plain civilians, and if they are
civilians, whether they acted on their own or were commanded to
accomplish the task, and by whom," the Court said.
It said it was non-sequitur (does not follow)
that simply because the plate TAB-194 belonging to the Isuzu XLT
vehicle is in the custody of the 56th IB, it was the military
that abducted Jonas.
The appellate court further said the argument
that the military has the motive to abduct Jonas because he was
in its "Order of Battle" is not conclusive, as there was no
admission or evidence that Jonas uses the nickname "Ka Ramon,"
"Raymond," "Simon," or "Mon."
"Even petitioner herself could not confirm if
Jonas used the alias ‘Ka Ramon’ or is known by his friends as
such, and whether Jonas is a member of the New People’s Army. In
fine, the Court is not convinced at this time that petitioner
has substantially proven the involvement of the military in the
alleged abduction of Jonas," the Court said.
The "Order of Battle" allegedly furnished by
Burgos’ friend in the military, whom she refused to identify,
being unsigned and unverified, "bolstered our suspicion that the
document could be fabricated… and cannot, and is in fact not
admitted by this Court."
The CA also dismissed the contempt charge
filed by Mrs. Burgos against the respondents for refusing to
disclose information on Jonas’ abduction.
Named respondents were President Arroyo; Gen.
(ret.) Hermogenes Esperon, former AFP chief; Lt. Gen. (ret.)
Romeo Tolentino, former Army chief; Maj. Juanito Gomez,
commanding officer of the 71st Infantry Division; Lt. Col. Noel
Clement, commanding officer of the Security and Escort battalion
based in Fort Bonifacio; and Lt. Col. Melquiades Feliciano,
former commander of the 56th IB.
The CA ordered AFP chief Lt. Gen. Alexander
Yano and PNP chief Avelino Razon Jr. to make available to the
petitioner all documents and records in their possession
relevant to the case of Jonas, subject to reasonable
regulations.
Razon was directed to continue with, and
conduct, a full and thorough investigation of the case and to
cause the immediate filing of charges against all those who may
be found responsible.
Yano was ordered to conduct an investigation
of the circumstances surrounding the loss of the license plate
and the possible involvement of any AFP personnel in the alleged
abduction of Jonas.
The Commission on Human Rights, which was impleaded as
respondent in the amparo petition, was also directed to furnish
the petitioner documents not yet on file with the CA. –
Evangeline de Vera