Environment Secretary Jose Atienza Jr. has said
the Philippines is not yet ready to let go of its coal-fired power
plants because it needs the power sources.
Atienza made the admission following the clamor
of environmental groups to shift to cleaner and renewable sources of
energy.
Atienza said his department supports the
environmental group Greenpeace, which is seeking an end to the use
of coal plants, but "we have to consider the national concern."
"We have to avail of this fuel to run our plants,
unless you want total darkness in some areas of the country," he
said.
He said the issue should be studied more
carefully before making a stance.
He said his department is against putting up
coal-fired power plants inside the cities because of the risks that
they pose to many people. However, he said "coal-fired power plants
outside (the cities), we could consider."
Atienza asked Greenpeace for more understanding,
saying that "since we are in the government, in providing service to
people we could not impose our own sentiments. There are other
concerns we have to consider."
"We're not totally against or for coal," he said.
Greenpeace said it was confused about Atienza's
position and urged the environment chief to think renewable energy
sources instead.
"The allusion that people in the provinces can be
allowed to suffer the toxic effects of operating a coal-fired power
plant while people from Manila should be protected from it is
outrageous," Greenpeace Climate and Energy Campaigner Jasper
Inventor said.
Greenpeace said studies have shown that Mercury,
the most toxic among the substances that coal plants emit can travel
as far as 600 kilometers.
Inventor said coal, wherever it is built, would
continue to emit carbon dioxide and damage the environment.
"The impacts of climate change demands that we have to rethink
this coal-intensive development pathway that our country is taking,"
he said. - Randy Nobleza