WEDNESDAY |JUNE 13, 2007 | PHILIPPINES

ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | WRITE US | ADVERTISE | ARCHIVES

 

 

‘How well do we know our history? For example, who originated the name “Filipino”?’

A bit of history
on the ‘Filipino’


The declaration of our independence on June 12, 1898 was a pivotal point in our history. But how well do we know our history? For example, who originated the name "Filipino"? We may vaguely think Rizal, Lopez Jaena, Marcelo del Pilar or other known patriots should be credited for this. But no, the "Filipino" movement rightfully belongs to the first wave of propagandists before the last two decades of the 18th century. And Luis Rodriquez Varela should be given the credit as precursor of the "Filipino" movement.

***

In 1890, Varela published "Proclama Historial," the first book in which a creole styled himself as a Filipino. Until Varela’s time, inhabitants of the islands were classified as: the Peninsulares (Spaniards who came to the islands), the Insulares (Spaniards born in the islands of pure Spanish ancestry), the Creoles (Spaniards of mixed parentage), and Indios (natives). At the time, inhabitants of Spain and America called the Creoles in the islands as "Filipinos" and this was the official reference to them in official documents. Wanting not to be regarded second-rate Spaniards, the Creoles of the Philippines simply called themselves "Spaniards," not Filipinos. But Varela in his book first called himself a Filipino using the name in a nationalistic spirit.

***

In 1910, Varela was commissioned by the City of Manila to compose instructions to Ventura de los Reyes, representative of the Philippines to the Spanish Cortes. Varela’s instructions embodied the plan of reforms advocated by propagandists of the period. Among these reforms were the opening of free schools, increased but selective Spanish immigration, and encouraging marriages between Spanish males and native females. Varela and the first propagandists he represented wanted to build a race of Filipinos we could genetically be proud of.

***

The second wave of propagandists was formed by prominent Creole families–such as the Zobels, De Taveras, Garchitorenas and Regidors–who carried Varela’s reform campaign. A Creole priest Fr. Pedro Pelaez led the movement to secularize parishes (assign native priests in parish churches) in the islands based on Canon law and the decrees of the Council of Trent. Father Jose Burgos, who inherited the movement from Pelaez who was a victim of the 1863 earthquake, was also a Creole priest.

***

But the Pelaez and Burgos militancy was interpreted as a separatist move. Fr. Pelaez was branded a rebel; and Fr. Burgos, accused of instigating the Cavite Mutiny, was to become Rey Indio or a president of a new government. And we know the Indio King with Frs. Gomez and Zamora were tried and executed. Gomburza enkindled the work of the propaganda work which shifted from the Philippines to Spain.

***

Through La Liga Filipina, Rizal attempted to create a civil society that would advocate reforms against violence and injustice, while giving civil protection to the populace, and encouraging instruction, agriculture and commerce. But Rizal’s civic work especially in the provinces was monitored and reported until he was considered a dangerous man. In time he was exiled to Dapitan, which led to the founding of the Katipunan.

***

Rizal’s martyrdom sparked the revolution with Emilio Aguinaldo staging the first victorious siege of Cavite de Viejo. Interestingly, Aguinaldo unselfishly gave way to Candido Tria Tirona to be the municipal head of the revolution, asking him to act as the flag lieutenant of the Philippine army. Aguinaldo’s victories in Cavite inspired the Katipuneros in the other provinces to join a full-scale rebellion.

***

Aguinaldo’s Magdalo group was organized as a revolutionary government, while Bonifacio’s Magdiwang organized as a monarchical government with Bonifacio assuming the title of King (Hari). On hindsight, if Bonifacio ha prevailed in assuming leadership of the revolution, we would have had a monarchical government. To reflect, a parliamentary form of government has sprung from monarchism (accommodating monarchs as in the case of UK), while a republican government goes farther away from monarchism by adopting a populist system of electing representatives from sectors and districts.

***

June 12, 1898 was a Sunday and since dawn of that day scores of Filipino fighters and commanders had been greeted by welcomers from Kawit and nearby towns. The crowd showed bright faces without frivolity. Their feeling had an undercurrent of thrill and drama. At nine o’clock General Aguinaldo, a few advisers and ranking generals of the revolution appeared. They took their seats at the balcony facing the crowd standing along the street. The local band of Kawit arrived and took their place in the yard beside Aguinaldo’s house. General Aguinaldo stood to raise the national tricolor, the flag of heavy silk sewn by the wives of members of the Hong Kong Junta. The raising of the flag was accompanied by the playing by the band of the stirring Marcha Filipino under the baton of Maestro Julian Felipe. At this point, the cheering of the crowd could not be restrained.

***

When the cheers of Vivas and Mabuhays ebbed, Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista read the text of the proclamation of independence. The proclamation was in Spanish but there were recognizable words and phrases such as "people of these islands Filipinas," "yoke of Spanish domination," cruel acts of the guardia civil," " abuses of the friars," and of course "nation" , "rights", "freedom."

***

The people had heard these words before. A pause and the people knew the reading was over and the people gave vent to their pent-up joy and thanks with deafening cheers and clapping. Aguinaldo and 96 representatives of the people signed the document. The proclamation was the voice of the Filipino people–of past, present and future. The band struck up the recessional and the troops broke ranks.

***

What are our chances of getting a piece of the worldwide medical tourism which is expected to grow to $188 billion by 2013? Not very much, unless we work on the structural weaknesses in the sector. Now it appears, this sector is disorganized and lacks cohesiveness. Also, we lack the accreditation of foreign health insurance firms which have a hold on institutional clients. Then we need to improve on our poor medical infrastructure, lack of modern medical equipment, research and information technology services. All in all, we see we lack the basic things needed before we can boast of a medical tourism industry.

***

As it is, medical tourism gives the country as regular stream of patients but these are mainly from expatriate Filipinos who avail of medical care (coronary by-pass surgery, cosmetic procedures, etc.) at rates 20 to 50 percent cheaper than those in other countries. Countries like India, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and recently Indonesia are frontrunners in the race for patients’ dollars. Given the migration trend in which we lose our best doctors and nurses, we may not be able to give medical tourism a boost, but instead, slip under the huge wave of the lucrative world medical tourism industry.

Email address: jesssison_2000@yahoo.com

 























Please address comments and suggestions to the Webmaster.
COPYRIGHT 2004 © People's Independent Media Inc.