ORE and more
people are asking whether the present air of protest enveloping some of our
countrymen and parts of our country will eventually lead to the ouster of
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.
You hear this type of discussion in coffee shops, across
family dining tables, in offices; wherever people gather and end up talking
about the political issues of the day.
And ever since Rodolfo "Jun" Lozada tearfully recounted not
only his ordeal at the hands of his VIP welcoming committee – a group of men who
referred to him as "ito" (this one or this thing) and who took him to places
that reminded him of the still-missing Bubby Dacer, the discussions have taken
on more passion and some sense of urgency all because people are beginning to
feel that next to the "Hello Garci" crisis that gripped the GMA administration
this one has the makings of a crisis that could lead to its downfall.
That is, if what I call the "Lozada moment" becomes a
conscienti-cization momentum that leads to an ouster movement. And, from the
early appearances, it seems that this time things are jelling in a way that they
didn’t even at the height of the uproar around the "Hello Garci" conspiracy.
What’s the difference? The growing involvement of the youth.
In 2005, when the taped voices were first aired, making
popular words and phrases like "Hello Ma’am" and "Will I still lead by 1 m?" the
leadership of the Roman Catholic Church was highly divided on what to do.
It was so divided – some even say misguided – that one bishop
was even quoted as saying that there was no basis for ousting Gloria for
cheating because everybody cheats anyway! I don’t know whether or not that
bishop was censured at all, but talk about providing moral leadership to your
flock! Ever since then every philandering husband could tell his wife, "What’s
the big deal? So many others cheat on their wives anyway?" And I don’t even know
if the number of people going to confession has dropped. Why confess a sin if
many people commit the same and bishops see nothing wrong with that?
Three years later the Church remains deeply divided, and in
fact runs the risk of being put in a position where it will be following, rather
than leading, its flock in the latter’s demand for truth, justice and
accountability.
In 2005 the military itself was divided. The military
hierarchy, invoking "adherence to the chain of command" issued order after order
prohibiting officers and men from telling what they knew about the electoral
fraud. But because many in the military leadership were said to be themselves
involved in the cheating, the order to adhere to the chain of command appeared
like an order to shut up so as not to endanger certain careers. Tensions came to
a boil in February of 2006 when elements of the Philippine Marines came close to
breaking that chain of command.
While the military leadership eventually took control of the
situation, one wonders if everything is really under control beneath the surface
three years later.
In 2005, the leaders of business were also divided. The
Makati Business Club and the Management Association of the Philippines, on one
hand, openly called on the President to resign. The Philippine Chamber of
Commerce and Industry, on the other, refused to join in that call. Three years
hence the situation remains the same.
But here is where 2008 differs from 2005. Across the National
Capital Region – from Ateneo to La Salle, UP to PUP – students are coming out in
droves to voice their protests over what they perceive to be an excess of greed
and a blatant attempt to silence people willing to speak the truth. Whether
through fora, noise barrages or walk-outs, young Filipinos are slowly emerging
from their cocoons and finding their courage and their voices, the way their
elders did 23 years ago after Ninoy Aquino was shot.
It is this element of protesting youth, more than anything
else, that should give PGMA and her team pause, because once the genie of
youthful protest is allowed out of the bottle, history has shown that it will be
very difficult – and potentially bloody – to try to push that genie back in.
The protesting youth in 2008 could very well be the missing
element that in 2005 failed to transform the "Hello Garci" moment into a
successful ouster movement.
From moment to momentum to movement: Will the Filipino youth
carry the burden of the fight for truth, justice and accountability that
elements of the military, the Church and big Business have abdicated?
If they can sustain that fight beyond just ousting presidents, in fact if
generation after generation of Filipino youth can serve as the vanguard for
idealism in public service and provide a constant stream of hope that we can
still build a better country, then I sure hope so.