ANAGEMENT means
preventing crises, not creating catastrophes. In the business world, the mother
of all crises is said to be the hostile takeover. If that is so, then its
equivalent in the public sphere has to be the invasion of a nation by aliens.
This kind of debacle has long been pointed out by social
contract theorists. To wit: "The usual, and almost only way whereby this union
is dissolved, is the inroad of foreign force making a conquest upon them: for in
that case, (not being able to maintain and support themselves, as one entire and
independent body) the union belonging to that body which consisted therein, must
necessarily cease, and so every one return to the state he was in before, with a
liberty to shift for himself, and provide for his own safety, as he thinks fit,
in some other society. Whenever the society is dissolved, it is certain the
government of that society cannot remain. Thus conquerors swords often cut up
governments by the roots, and mangle societies to pieces, separating the subdued
or scattered multitude from the protection of, and dependence on, that society
which ought to have preserved them from violence." [John Locke, "Chapter XIX: Of
the Dissolution of Government," Second Treatise of Civil Government, 1690]
And all it takes is one jerk. A sentry asleep at the switch.
A careless clerk. A corrupt employee. But none worse than the hardhearted,
overly ambitious, incompetent chief executive. How many CEOs bailed out while
their companies were ruined? How often do prime ministers and presidents and
kings plunge their constituencies into chaos?
A kingdom can be carved out of conquest, but that rooster
will come home to roost. The Japanese in the haze of their militarism ran wild
in the Asia-Pacific but their rampage was brought to a halt by strange, new
weapons that fell from the sky.
It began when a monarch of the Yamato invaded Korea, making
the peninsula her tributary. It ended when the American shogun took the Tenno
off his high horse and brought his "celestial" chambers back to earth.
Toyotomi, fuelled by personal ambition, tried to invade China
and failed miserably. Though he locked Japan’s doors afterwards, the so-called
land of the rising sun could not keep out the Westerners, especially when
Commodore Perry and the black ships came calling centuries later.
Seventeen countries invoked the Townsend Harris concept of
Extra-Territoriality in Japan, yet it only bestirred the Yamato to embark on its
own hegemonism in the form of the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-95. As a prize, the
Mikado took the Liaoyang Peninsula and other territories from the Qing Dynasty.
"Japan placed her feet on the continent, the possession of
the islands which assured her the supremacy of the Chinese Seas, and imposed her
machines and industries on the vanquished nation. If she did not want to annex
it, she at least wanted to make sure that she should exploit it." [Paul Lafargue,
"The Chino-Japanese War," Justice, June 1, 1895]
Then, in 1904-5, it was turn of the Russian Czar to take a
beating at the hands of the Japanese. Ten years hence, with appetites whetted,
the hegemonists joined the winning side in the First World War. More booty, more
desires.
In the Roaring Twenties, the rural and bourgeois youth of
Japan were indoctrinated into the barracks life. They came of age and were fed
as cannon fodder in the violence of the Great Depression.
The Japanese re-invaded China, raping Nanjing in 1937. The
circle of destruction grew. Mongolia was assaulted, but the terrorists of Tenno
were repulsed. French Indochina was suborned and the stage was set for an
inescapable confrontation with the Western powers.
The collapse of Anglo-Saxon rule in many parts of the Orient
aggravated the endangerment of the democracies as the Fascist machine rolled
across Europe and Africa. Be that as it may, the Japanese were wrong to assume
that they would be invincible overlords.
An example of their big booboo was the public commitment of
the Koiso administration to a Japanese victory at Leyte, likening the campaign
to the 1582 Battle of Tennozan, which was a Japanese historical juncture. "Thus,
Koiso effectively proclaimed to the nation that the victor at Leyte would win
the war." [Richard B. Frank. Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire.
NY: Penguin Books, 1999, p. 90]
Guess what? The Allies -- Americans, Australians and
Filipinos -- won at Leyte. The Japanese predicament could not be remedied by a
simple change of administration. Worse for them, though the Emperor himself may
have wanted to extricate his tentacles from the South Seas and have a negotiated
peace that would let him keep some of his ill-gotten gains, Hirohito also wanted
one more big win before any ceasefires.
On June 9, 1945, Hirohito’s Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal
wrote a "Draft Plan for Controlling the Crisis Situation," which tied a Japanese
withdrawal from the battlefield to the granting of independence of the former
European colonies in Southeast Asia and Southwest Pacific and the mediation of a
power not yet embroiled in the Great Eastern War.
On the Allied side, it was settled that Japan would be
strangled with a range of offensives, from the minimum of a blockade and
bombardment to the maximum of an invasion of Kyushu. The choice given to the
enemy was unconditional surrender or ultimate defeat.
On the Japanese side, the non-negotiable item was the
preservation of the Chrysanthemum Throne. Their nightmare scenario was the
disillusioned masses rising in a Communist revolution. Thus, the imperial
staffers were frenzied into hatching a Ketsu-Go (Decisive Operation) master plan
to defend their home islands, envisioning the annihilation of expected American
beachheads at Kyushu and do-or-die conditions in six other areas.
Japan was spared of a Soviet Occupation and horrendous land
battles with Americans. Japan escaped a revolution (native, liberal democratic
or Communist) and Hirohito kept his crown and his head. The Japanese acceded to
an American Occupation, but only after the firebombing of Tokyo and the nuking
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The war was precipitated and managed by the Japanese
militarists on behalf of their deified king. The Japanese people sacrificed
their health, happiness and homes for the enrichment of the Emperor, his
warlords and the zaibatsus.
Was it worth it?