IKE the rest of
this broad sheet, this column disagrees -often vehemently - with policies and
pronouncements of Malacañang and its minions. It came as a surprise therefore
when, last week, one of the staunchest of Palace partners, the newly elected
Speaker of the House of Representatives himself, uttered a statement that made
sense. This congressman from Davao came up with the bold suggestion that the
Catholic Church and other religious groups should begin to pay taxes on their
vast landholdings and numerous profitable enterprises.
Not only does the tax-exempt status of the Church violate the
principle of the separation of Church and State; it also makes a mockery of the
principle of equality and promotes the disgraceful inequity that characterizes
this poor country. Exclusive Catholic schools are extremely profitable business
ventures. They provide expensive education for children of the elite - using
their wealth to attract the best teachers and to buy the best in educational
technology while enjoying tax-free privileges.
Meanwhile, the massive numbers of poor children who also need
education are abandoned in ramshackle public schoolrooms with inadequate
primitive teaching tools. Their poorly paid teachers fall further behind in
their heroic efforts partly because they are not given chances for continuing
education to upgrade their skills.
And yet, it is the opposition of the Catholic Church to the
provision of reproductive health and family planning services that accounts for
the persistent growth in the numbers of poor children who eventually become
poorly educated adults. Because of benighted dogma that regards all sex as
sinful and prevents government from making reproductive information and services
available to them, women of the poorest segments of society continue to bear an
average of 6 children during their reproductive lifetimes. Meanwhile their rich
counterparts, with the access to modern technology that money can buy, have only
two children during their child-bearing years.
Unfortunately, the seeming enlightenment of the new Speaker
of the House is not expected to be lasting. Neither is it likely to have any
serious influence on policy in this present government. After all, the Speaker
just like his beloved leader and the rest of this unscrupulous administration is
a well-known practitioner of transactional or unprincipled politics. He merely
used the threat of taxation as a political weapon to bully the religious leaders
growing increasingly restive with the immoral behavior of the administration as
a whole.
On one hand, unprincipled politics is the Macapagal-Arroyo
government's most effective trait, enabling it to keep many sectors happy. On
the other hand it is also its most serious weakness, forcing it to back away
from policies beneficial to the people. Very recent events in the health sector
demonstrate this observation.
When the Hospital Detention Law was enacted, patient's rights
groups were jubilant that poor people unable to afford exorbitant hospital
charges could no longer be held hostage by greedy hospitals. However, the
hospitals and their equally rapacious physician allies countered with the threat
of a "hospital holiday" - thereby, withholding services from patients in need.
Under this pressure, the government backed off and developed "Implementing Rules
and Regulations" that effectively emasculated the provisions of the new law.
The "generics only prescriptions" provision of the lower
house version of the "Cheaper Medicines Bill" was actually introduced at the
suggestion of DOH's own technical staff in the congressional task force that
crafted the bill. However, when the bill was finally approved by Congress,
medical practitioners, supported by the pharmaceutical lobby, once again
threatened a "hospital holiday." The pressure apparently reached Malacañang
which in turn instructed the DOH to withdraw its support for the "generics only"
provision. The result is the present deadlock at the bicameral committee where,
ironically, the Senate contingent favors the Palace position against the
provision while the House side continues to defend its position - despite DOH
abandonment.
On the issue of kidney transplants from living unrelated
donors (commercially obtained kidneys), the DOH has dragged its feet in the face
of a strong "medical tourism" lobby that would ignore the fact that current
practices are gross violations of even the most rudimentary of ethical
principles. Even as the government's own National Kidney and Transplant
Institute celebrated its 25th anniversary last week, DOH maintains its silence
on the issue.
It is ironic that a government claiming to be "matatag" is so vulnerable to
pressure from interest groups especially in the sectors that matter most to the
poor - health, social services, and education. The present near-chaos in
Philippine politics is clear evidence that the administration installed a motley
group of power-brokers bereft of political principles and commitment lacks a
firm foundation to anchor its legitimacy. It might be possible that this
weak-kneed bunch can hang on to the reins until the next elections - but just
barely and at the expense of the poor individuals, families and communities that
desperately need services.