FRIDAY |MARCH 07, 2008| PHILIPPINES

ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | WRITE US | ADVERTISE | ARCHIVES

 

The Supreme Court's call


Editorial
 

'What was so damming about what Gloria said or did that she is risking ouster to keep it secret?'

The senators did the right thing in rejecting a proposed "compromise" over Romulo Neri's appearance before the joint panel looking into the national broadband deal. Had they agreed to limit Neri's testimony to the inconsequential, the senators would have effectively castrated themselves and relinquished Congress' powers to conduct inquiries in aid of legislation.

The spotlight is now on the Supreme Court. It has to rule on Neri's petition that the Senate's arrest order against him for contempt be voided. The tribunal has to revisit Senate vs Ermita and come up with a clearer delineation of where the claim of executive privilege extends and where it stops. It should not be the case that everytime the issue of executive privilege is raised, one party or the other runs to the Supreme Court for a ruling.

Take the case Neri. The Senate has listed down three questions which it says it intends to put before Neri. The questions are: 1) Did the President show any undue interest in the national broadband network project, 2) Did the President direct Neri to prioritize the NBN project, and; 3) Did she order the continuance of the project despite allegations of bribery?

It's a long stretch to claim that answering the three questions would jeopardize national security or diplomatic relations. So where does executive privilege come in?

It has been established in the Senate hearings that the NBN project originally was meant to be undertaken through a build-operate-transfer arrangement. Neri had been adamant on this. Suddenly Neri turned around and approved a proposal to adopt the project as a government undertaking. Why the turnaround and when was the decision made by, initially, the National Economic and Development Authority staff and, subsequently, by the NEDA board, of which Gloria Arroyo is the chairman?

Neri has testified that he was offered a P200 million bribe by then election chairman Benjamin Abalos in exchange for NEDA's endorsement of the project as a purely government undertaking. He said he informed Gloria about the bribe offer, but was instructed to approve the project nonetheless.

Asked during his initial appearance at the Senate hearing to elaborate on Arroyo's instructions, he clammed up and invoked executive privilege.

From then on, the Palace has been stonewalling efforts to uncover the truth about the NBN deal, to the point where people are now calling for Arroyo's resignation because of suspicions of a cover-up.

What was so damming about what Gloria said or did that she is risking ouster to keep it secret?

With the grace of the Supreme Court, we will likely know soon enough.

 


 
















Please address comments and suggestions to the Webmaster.
COPYRIGHT 2004 © People's Independent Media Inc.