mutual respect for
political beliefs." This is how one news report described how four of the
administration’s senatorial bets in the 2007 elections could conveniently forget
their anti-Charter change stance and now sing high hosannas to the mastermind of
mutilating the 1987 Constitution.
According to Sen. Joker Arroyo, former senators Vicente Sotto
III and Teresa Aquino-Oreta and fellow re-electionist Ralph Recto may be against
the shift to a parliamentary form of government Cha-Cha but still joined the
Arroyo administration slate since they can, at least, tolerate each other’s
principles.
Of course, that raises the question of what the chances are
of someone winning a Senate seat when he is open to have it extinguished. Can
one really say, in effect, "Vote for me and I will see to it that your vote gets
wasted by agreeing to abolish the Senate…"?
It is tragic how some of the brightest minds that we have can
callously look down on the intelligence of the rest of us. But then, that’s
traditional politics for you.
It seemed just like yesterday that the maverick senator for
the Bicol region was magnificently lambasting the administration moves to render
him prematurely jobless. The same goes for Recto, who won a six-year term in
2001 by the seat of his pants. And the memories of Sotto and Oreta campaigning
tooth-and-nail for Fernando Poe Jr. are still fresh in our minds.
And yet all four are on the other side of the fence with a
political overlord whom they had branded as either a cheat or an enemy of
democracy. Maybe that is why the political rally of independent candidate and
former Senator Gregorio "Gringo" Honasan in Davao City drew as big a crowd as
any compared to that of the administration, reportedly propped up by "hakots".
Honasan’s support remains since voters perceive him to still
be anti-administration despite not being included in the opposition senatorial
slate.
In fairness to the four hopefuls, however, their teammates
are spouting inconsistencies at a fairly equal rate. Notable among them is
Surigao del Sur Rep. Prospero Pichay, who says that the "Hello Garci" scandal
was just a "lapse" and not a serious offense at all. Pichay goes on to say,
"This only shows the ignorance of the opposition. These coming elections are for
both Houses of Congress which pertain to matters of legislation, unless (the
opposition members) want to project that the Senate is not independent of the
executive branch," Pichay said.
Not independent of the executive branch? In all honesty, how
can Pichay really stand for an independent Senate when he is getting his hands
raised by the architect of its attempted assassination? I do not recall hearing
the main power center of Malacañang having thrown in the towel over shifting to
a parliamentary form of government.
The coming political exercise, being a mid-term election, may
not be as exciting as a the presidential election. But it is certainly no less
important. Why else would Arroyo be so keen on picking up the rejects and
discards of the opposition camp and co-opt them into critically collaborating
with her regime? Is there really a shortage of deserving and winnable senatorial
candidates from within the administration camp?
Most importantly, is critical collaboration really possible with this
administration? Is it possible to sleep with the dragon and not wake up a burn
victim? I think not. More likely, all this alleged willingness to bite the hand
that feeds them is merely telling the voters what they want to hear in the name
of shameless self-preservation.