AMID protests from militant groups, the
Commission on Elections yesterday said it will not order the
Armed Forces to pull out at least 240 soldiers deployed in
urban communities since November.
Chairman Benjamin Abalos said the poll body
cannot interfere in the deployment which he said is a military
activity.
Abalos said he has been informed by Maj.
Gen. Benjamin Dolorfino, chief of the National Capital Region
Command which deployed the troops, that the military presence
in several urban poor communities in Metro Manila is part of
the soldiers’ training, particularly barangay immersion
activities.
Abalos has previously said the poll body
can interfere in cases that involve the elections but not in
"purely military" activities.
The military has said the deployment is
part of the soldiers’ training preparatory to peacekeeping
assignments abroad. The training involves medical and dental
missions, "limited engineering works" and cleanliness drives.
Abalos, asked how long the military’s
presence will be allowed, said, "as long as they are needed."
Last week, several party list groups such
as Bayan Muna, Gabriella, and Anakpawis filed complaints
saying the deployed soldiers were engaging in political
activities. They alleged that the soldiers, who were in full
battle uniform, were telling residents not to vote for
party-list groups associated with the Left.
This prompted Abalos to seek an explanation
from the Armed Forces.
Abalos defended the military presence,
saying the streets are safer with them around.
Abalos said he does not see any problem
with the presence of military personnel as long as they are
there to protect the people from crimes and acts of terrorism.
"Aren’t you happy they are here? I mean… it
is much safer these days… Compared to other countries, I think
we are much safer because terrorism in the Philippines is
controlled. Not like before during the LRT bombing and others…
We should really commend our law enforcement people," he said.
"Why should we stop the military (in their
operations) after their intelligence reports showed that there
is possible presence of terrorists in these areas," Abalos
also said.
Defense Undersecretary Ernesto Carolina
said he sees no reason to pull out the soldiers.
He said the soldiers "are doing the right
thing."
"The training is effective. They have been
there since last year. They have been there even before the
election period," he said.
Militant organizations are saying the
soldiers have gone as far as campaigning for administration
candidates.
"If you are going to listen to all the
barks of the dogs, you will never reach your destination,"
said Carolina, quoting former Defense Secretary Orlando
Mercado, who handled the defense portfolio during the Estrada
government.
On the reported order of Malacañang to pull
out the soldiers from the 27 Metro Manila barangays, Carolina
said: "None that I know of. In the first place, they do not
meddle in the deployment of forces. That’s the call of the
military commander."
Carolina said the deployment is in line
with Defense Secretary Hermogenes Ebdane Jr.’s "defense for
development program" which calls for touching base with the
people.
"We are seeing that CMO (civil military
operations) is a defense for development approach, meaning
more on the soft approach rather than the hard approach,
soldiers joining hand in hand with local leaders," Carolina
said.
Lt. Col. Bartolome Bacarro, chief of the
AFP public information office, said the deployed soldiers have
been ordered to wear the general office attire (GOA), instead
of their battle dress or camouflage uniform, "because there
are many questions why the soldiers are in camouflage
uniform."
Dolorfino said he ordered the soldiers to
change to office attire "because we don’t want them (soldiers)
to be looking too mean." Referring to leftist groups, he
added: "They are reacting (to the deployment)."
"It’s (soldiers going on office attire) one
of the modifications that we are making so that the people
would not be scared when we patrol the streets," Dolorfino
also said.
He added the some of the soldiers would remain armed with
handguns. – Gerard Anthony Naval and Victor Reyes