THE lawyers of some 10,000 Filipino human
rights victims yesterday expressed confidence that the United
States Supreme Court will favor their claim to the $40 million
ill-gotten wealth of the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos after
the oral arguments set for March 17.
American lawyer Robert Swift, who will argue
the case for the martial law victims against a counter-claim on
the money by the Philippine government, said evidence is on
their side that the amount stashed away in a brokerage account
at Merrill Lynch in the name of Arelma, a phony Panamanian
corporation, does not belong to the Philippine government as
claimed and should be distributed to the rights victims.
"We are confident in the strength of our
arguments. Just as we prevailed in the two lower courts, we hope
to prevail here. The Republic never had any evidence that the
Marcos account at Merrill Lynch ever belonged to the Philippine
government. The govern-ment’s role in the litigation is spiteful
and disrespectful to the victims of government brutality. Even
the United Nations has sanctioned it for disregarding the rights
of the victims under international law," Swift said in a
statement he signed along with his co-counsel Rodrigo Domingo.
In 1995 the victims obtained a historic $2
billion judgment against Marcos for instigating torture, summary
execution and involuntary disappearance during the martial law
years.
But the Presidential Commission on Good
Government (PCGG) and the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG)
have consistently blocked before US courts the release of the
Arelma money to the martial law victims, claiming that since the
amount was ill-gotten this should be released to the National
Treasury and then to the government’s Comprehensive Agrarian
Reform Program.
The Philippine government even sought to
remove US Judge Manuel Real, who decided in favor of the Marcos
victims, from hearing the case but failed. The appeals have
delayed the distribution of the money for 3-1/2 years now. Each
victim is expected to receive $20,000 if the court rules for
them.
At the same time, Swift chided US Solicitor
General Paul Clement for supporting the Philippine government’s
claim and US Ambassador to the Philippines Kristie Kenney for
not doing enough to help the Filipino human rights victims.
"It is disappointing that the US Solicitor
General and the American Ambassador to the Philippines do not
understand the significance of this case to ordinary Filipinos.
Filipinos in general want to see justice done for the victims
and have them compensated. All the American government wants is
to assist friendly but corrupt regime. In doing so, it will reap
a grim harvest," Swift said adding that the case will be the
first time that the US High Court has reviewed a case involving
massive human rights violations.
Domingo chided the Philippine government for "spending
limitless funds of the people to defeat their claims" saying
that the amount "could have been use to feed the country’s poor"
rather than on litigation. – Ashzel Hachero