By Paul Majendie
LONDON — A British court ordered former
Beatle Paul McCartney on Monday to pay his estranged wife
Heather Mills 24.3 million pounds ($48.7 million) after an
acrimonious divorce battle.
The settlement was only a fifth of the sum
she had sought but she still ended up with the equivalent of
about $34,000 for each day of her four-year marriage to the pop
icon.
Speaking after the judge’s ruling, Mills
said: "I am so glad it is over. It is an incredible result in
the end.
"We are very, very pleased," she added. "I am
so, so happy with it." McCartney declined to comment.
McCartney, 65, married the former model and
charity campaigner Mills, 40, in 2002 but they separated four
years later, blaming media intrusion into their private lives.
They have a daughter, Beatrice, aged four.
Following one of the most bitter divorce
battles in showbusiness history, the couple failed to reach an
agreement after six days in court last month, leaving the judge
to set the final figure.
Mills criticized McCartney’s lawyer Fiona
Shac-kleton, accusing her of handling the case badly.
She said Shac-kleton, who also represented
heir-to-the-throne Prince Charles in his divorce from Princess
Diana, "has called me many, many names before even meeting me,
when I was in a wheelchair".
Mills, who sacked her lawyer and represented
herself in court, urged would-be divorcees to do the same. "You
can be a litigating person," she said. "You’d save yourself a
fortune."
Justice Hugh Bennett, giving details of the
settlement, said: "She sought an award of almost 125 million
pounds. Sir Paul proposed the wife should exit the marriage with
assets of 15.8 million pounds inclusive of any lump sum award.
"The judgment decided that the husband should
pay the wife a lump sum of 16.5 million pounds, which together
with her assets of 7.8 million pounds means that she exits her
marriage with total assets of 24.3 million pounds."
The split was fought out under a remorseless
media spotlight with McCartney, a founder of the world’s most
famous pop group, pitted against the outspoken Mills, target of
lurid tales in the press about her colorful past.
The court ruled that the judgment be made
public, but stayed publication pending Mills’ appeal against it
being made public.
Mills, speaking to a phalanx of reporters on
the steps of London’s High Court, said she was appealing
"because the judgment involves private secure matters of my
daughter".
Referring to what their daughter would
receive, Mills said: "Beatrice only gets 35,000 pounds a year.
So obviously she’s meant to travel B Class while her father
travels A class, but obviously I will pay for that."
Asked if she now planned to move abroad, Mills said: "I can’t
leave England. I always wanted to keep my daughter near her
father. Believe me if I tried to go, he would have an injunction
on me in a second." – Reuters