t’s easy enough to
say that we Filipinos have little to do with the state of the world’s climate. I
mean, how can our willful eradication of forests, our destruction of fishing
beds, our decimation of rivers and disregard for air pollution compare to what
the United States, China and India are doing? Besides, what good would our puny
efforts do to counter the magnitude of the destruction?
I have to confess that I was struck dumb when I was
pontificating to my second son about the evils of SUVs - having just watched "An
Inconvenient Truth" - when he retorted that it was my generation’s
irresponsibility that was the cause of global warming. Truth to tell I hadn’t
thought about it from that point of view. But due to the fierceness of typhoons
like Katrina and Millenio and the warning that there would be more of them this
year, that summers would be distressingly and increasingly warmer and that
extremes in weather conditions were what we could expect, it occurred to me that
not one of our leaders was addressing the problem. Of course, given their
limited abilities it is understandable that they can only focus on one thing at
a time and at the moment that One Thing has everything to do with getting
themselves elected to public office. Their track record however doesn’t fill us
with confidence; we can be sure that none of them will seriously bother with the
environment after the campaign.
During my teens I read several books that altered my way of
thinking. Simone de Beauvoir’s "The Second Sex," is one. Having been orphaned at
an early age and brought up by my mother and sisters, De Beauvoir’s theme on the
essence of woman appealed to my antipathy towards a patriarchal system and
belief in women’s rights. Another was John Knowles "A Separate Peace," about
trust, betrayal, friendship, and finding your true identity was important at an
age when you question who and what you are. Then there was Lawrence Sterne’s "Tristram
Shandy" with its repeated images of human un-relatedness and disconnection and
the implied suggestion that perhaps human beings remain forever isolated had
tremendous appeal. Throughout this adolescence it was a pleasure to counter – at
least mentally – the teachings of society since convent girls were at least
outwardly supposed to conform.
Conformity never did hold any appeal. I have held firm to the
belief that despite Filipinas’ seeming freedom the majority are still shackled
by society’s strictures and by a poverty that dictates men should have
preference when it comes to education. Her acceptance as well of life as "a veil
of tears" and the redemptive powers of suffering has proven inimical to changing
a system that no longer works. But what I want to get to is that soon after
Sterne came John Donne and his concept that contrary to Sterne’s premise "no man
is an Island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of
the main; if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if
a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were;
any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankind; And therefore
never send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee." (Meditation
XVII)
This sense of community with the entire world (not to mention
our next door neighbor and even the members of our barangay) is something that
has been totally lacking in us. If it doesn’t concern close relatives we
couldn’t care less. Are we really interested in what is happening in Darfur?
What about the injustices committed at Guantanamo – do we even know where the
prison is located?
This is what makes the climate changes so dangerous and
terrifying; since we barely connect to the rest of the nation we don’t grasp
that as part of humanity we have been responsible for altering this planet’s
climate with disastrous results for our children and grandchildren.
I have actually heard friends state that it won’t matter
because they’d be dead by then or that their offspring could always move to
Kansas. We really do not have a sense of urgency or moral responsibility as a
nation and are more concerned with Kris Aquino’s love life or which celebrities
will grace the halls of our Batasan or Senate than in the fact that we are
destroying the only planet that can hold life as we know it.
It may be of course that the educated among us don’t grasp the dangers at
all. In that case it’s up to the leadership to inform the public that there is
clear and imminent danger and that the possibility of drought, lack of potable
water, disease and famine are just as threatening as a jihad. The sad part is
that our system is inimical to an informed public and yet it is this majority
that will suffer the most. Unfortunately, a political campaign based on what
kind of a country and ultimately what kind of world we want to live in is
unlikely to get anyone elected to even dogcatcher around here.