hinzo Abe’s
obsession with the difficulties of his present and his denial of the truthful
past does not bode well for his future.
What does Abe believe? That Japan won World War Two? That
Japan had a noble cause in wreaking havoc across Southeast Asia?
That the Imperial Japanese was a master race? That Hirohito
was everybody’s god?
How would Abe react to Hitler’s estimation that since "the
ancient civilization of Japan actually became fossilized and petrified," it owed
its later development to the Aryan influence? [Mein Kampf, 1934. Translated into
English by James Murphy, 1939]
Does Abe concur with his wartime predecessor’s assessment
that: "The materials of Japan, Man-choukuo and China added with the materials of
the various areas of the southern region…have established a foundation of
strengthening and expanding our military power." Prime Minister Hideki Tojo
bragged about the confiscations conducted by the Nipponese military in his
address to the Opening Session of the Diet on May 27, 1942.
What about the Italian fascist dictator’s take? "It is with
raw materials that Japan has enriched herself. They are the prime raw materials
of which our enemies are being impoverished." [Benito Mussolini, Premier of
Italy, Speech to the Chamber of Fasci and Corporations, Rome, December 2, 1942]
Is it a zero-sum game as well for Abe?
As it is, Japan is already the world’s leading importer of
tropical timber, the number one market for Philippine fish and a dependent buyer
of Middle Eastern oil. Japan’s craving for other nation’s natural resources – a
failing that made it a plundering Axis aggressor – underlines its status as the
World Bank’s third largest lender, the Asian Development Bank’s heaviest
investor and Asean’s biggest trade partner. [Renato Constantino, "The Second
Invasion"]
Moreover, Japan has to watch out for "a fall in productivity
and investment feasibility" given its graying population. [JR Chaponniere,
"Southeast And East Asia Towards 2020: Exploring An Image Of Asia’s Future"]
Japan’s balancing act, Abe has to remember, is easily upset.
By trade disputes with Europe and the United States. By autonomous links among
members of Asean in addition to rivalries among Japanese transnational
corporations operating within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. By
China’s courtship of Asia-Pacific economies.
Abe has to stabilize the situation for Japan’s benefit
instead of stoking the fires of discord. Is he apathetic to the fact that
resurgent Japanese militarism and the eruption of the comfort women issue in
August 1991 "has continued to dog Japan’s relations with South Korea and its
other East Asian neighbors?" [Glen D. Hook, "Japan And East Asia: The Impact Of
Economic Links"]
Abe must also keep in mind that in the eyes of Filipinos,
Japan bears the stigma of being the clearest example of a domineering
neocolonial kingdom. The Yakuza’s syndication of japayuki entertainers and the
onerous conditionalities of Official Development Assistance will be aggravated
by the deplorable provisions of the JPEPA.
Abe has to know that it is not only the Filipinos who rebuke
the rightist, the fascist, the militarist presumption of history. Abe has
constituents who consider the move of Japanese legislators to water down the
Kono Statement as "the conspiracy to deny Japan’s responsibility for the comfort
women issue." At the same time, these Japanese voters "condemn the double
standard of Prime Minister Abe who tolerates this kind of campaign in his own
Cabinet."
The Japan Military Sex Slavery Issue Action Network c/o the
Japan Anti-Prostitution Association, with address at 2-23-25 Hyakunin-cho,
Shinjuku, Tokyo, points to the December 2006 announcement of Hirofumi Shinomura,
Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary, and Shoichi Nakagawa, chairman of the Liberal
Democratic Party Policy Research Council, that the Kono Statement needs
rethinking.
The Kono Statement refers to the August 4, 1993
acknowledgement by Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono of the involvement of the
Japanese military authorities in the establishment and management of so-called
comfort women stations across Asia and the transport of sex slaves in
Japanese-occupied territories during World War II. In admitting that many
Korean, Chinese, Filipino, Indonesian, Taiwanese, Malaysian and other Asian
girls and women were coerced into living in misery in Japanese military sex
stations, Kono also offered the firm view of the Japanese Government never to
repeat the same mistake by engraving such issues in the memories of the Japanese
people.
The Kono Statement, which is now 12 years old, has been
bolstered by rediscovered Japanese government and military documents, court
cases and painful testimonies of surviving comfort women of unwanted pregnancies
and venereal diseases caused by the rapacious Nipponese troops.
Abe needs to affirm the Kono Statement if he wants to turn
Japan into a "beautiful country" and keep peace with Tokyo’s neighbors, partners
and rivals. Abe can uphold the Kono Statement by instructing the Japanese
Education Ministry to teach Japanese students the truth about World War II.
Nippon imposed the criminal war of aggression on Asia-Pacific. Nippon
enslaved Asian girls and women during the war. Nippon conducted biomedical
experiments on prisoners of war. Nippon waged germ warfare on civilians. Nippon
raped Nanking and Manila. Nippon lost the war. Nippon deserved to lose the war.