SENATE minority leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr.
yesterday assailed Malacañang for blocking the approval of House
Bill 3216 which would define the country's archipelagic map.
"It is incumbent upon us to protect and
assert our territorial rights over the seas around us, and even
to the extent of 200 nautical miles from the edge of our seas as
our exclusive economic zone," he said.
Under HB 3216, the country's archipelagic
baselines would include the Kalayaan Island Group or Spratly
islands and Scarborough Shoal.
Malacañang asked for the postponement of the
passage of the bill and for its re-commitment to the House
committee on foreign affairs to incorporate amendments proposed
by the Commission on Maritime and Ocean Affairs under the Office
of the President.
The Palace's move came after Beijing sent a
note to Manila that putting "the Scarborough Shoal and some
other Nansha (Spratly) reefs and islands inside the baseline of
the Philippines will not be conducive to stability. (and will)
also disturb China-Philippine cooperation in the area."
Pimentel said Congress and the executive
branch should adopt a common position on the issue of the urgent
legislation to protect its territorial right over the disputed
Kalayaan Island Group.
He said the bill should be prioritized by the
Senate to complement a similar undertaking by the House and to
beat the May 2009 deadline set by the United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS).
Pimentel said the admission of Philippine
National Oil Co. president Antonio Cailao in a published
statement that the entire 142,886-square kilometer area covered
by the 2005 Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking in the South China
Sea among the Philippines, China and Vietnam "is all within
Philippine territory" makes it more imperative for the
Philippines to define its archipelagic baselines.
"If what he (Cailao) said is true, all the
more we should push for a definition of our territory whatever
the opinion of other countries may be," Pimentel said.
He said Congress and Malacañang should
resolve their differences over the configuration of the
Philippine archipelagic map without in any way creating the
impression that the country's legal and historic claim to the
Kalayaan Island Group may be compromised or weakened.
He said it would be ridiculous for the Philippines not to
include the Kalayaan Island Group within its archipelagic
baselines because this is being made precisely in pursuit of its
rights as an archipelagic state under UNCLOS. - Dennis
Gadil