FORMER Senate President Franklin Drilon
yesterday warned that Malacañang's recent "victory" before the
Supreme Court in the case of acting Higher Education chair
Romulo Neri may embolden President Arroyo to revive her plan to
amend the 1987 Constitution through the so-called People's
Initiative.
"The Supreme Court decision on the Neri case
might give Malacañang the impression that the High Court is now
sympathetic to its side. This could encourage President Arroyo
to go back to the Supreme Court and seek a reversal of its
earlier ruling declaring the so-called People's Initiative for
Charter Change as unconstitutional," Drilon, a former justice
secretary, said.
"We respect the decision of the Supreme Court
but we respectfully disagree with its position that Neri can
invoke executive privilege to conceal the role of the President
in the NBN deal," Drilon said.
"Executive privilege should never be invoked
to conceal any wrongdoing in government," he added. "We are
concerned that this case will now tilt the balance in favor of a
sitting President who has repeatedly exhibited her propensity to
disregard the law."
On Oct. 25, 2006, the Supreme Court threw out
the consolidated petitions for a People's Initiative to amend
the 1987 Constitution with a vote of 8-7.
In its ruling, the Tribunal branded as
"deceptive and misleading" the moves of the Malacañang-backed
Sigaw ng Bayan and Union of Local Authorities of the Philippines
to shift from the bicameral presidential form of government to
unicameral parliamentary system.
The 52-page en banc decision penned by
Associate Justice Antonio Carpio denied due course to what he
called a "constitutionally infirmed" petition for initiative
jointly filed by Sigaw ng Bayan led by lawyer Raul Lambino and
the Ulap headed by Bohol Gov. Erico Aumentado.
The court said that petitioners failed to inform initiative
signers of the nature and effect of the proposals, and failure
to do so is "deceptive and misleading, which renders the
initiative void."