TUESDAY |APRIL 1, 2008| PHILIPPINES

ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | WRITE US | ADVERTISE | ARCHIVES

 

‘Evidence enough to convict Abadia’


UNLESS former Armed Forces chief of staff Lisandro C. Abadia can successfully counter government evidence against him, he will face certain conviction for perjury, the Sandiganbayan First Division said.

In a resolution promulgated April 16, the graft court junked Abadia’s challenge on the sufficiency of the prosecution’s evidence against him. "At this stage of the proceedings, the prosecution’s testimonial and documentary evidence are sufficient for purposes of finding accused guilty of the offense charged," the court declared.

Abadia was directed to start presenting evidence in his defense on May 19, 20 and 21.

Ombudsman investigators showed that Abadia declared an extra income of P2.55 million supposedly from the sale of his real property in Talisay, Cebu in March 1992 in statement of assets, liabilities and net worth for that same year.

However, prosecutor Janina Hidalgo presented documents from the Talisay Registry of Deeds and the Bureau of Internal Revenue which showed the subject property was sold for only P200,000. This was corroborated by lawyer Manolo Rubi, Register of Deeds for Cebu.

When the Ombudsman ordered the filing of perjury and forfeiture cases against him in 2004, Abadia presented a handwritten receipt and a memorandum of agreement with the buyers but the Ombudsman rejected both for being filed belatedly and being mere machine copies.

"(The evidence) show that accused (Abadia’s) as-sertion of an increase in his income by P2,550,000 from the sale of real property is false. Accused should explain the apparent conflict between the entry in his 1992 SALN and the documents presented by the prosecution," the court said.

The court also dismissed Abadia’s contention that he should have been given the chance to correct the error in his SALN, citing as precedent a similar perjury case over his SALN against President Joseph Estrada who was acquitted. The court said Estrada was indicted for an incomplete SALN whereas Abadia was charged for making a false claim in his SALN.

Former Ombudsman Simeon Marcelo, who ordered Abadia’s indictment for alleged ill-gotten wealth and the filing of forfeiture petition with the Sandiganbayan, said properties worth more than P11 million acquired by the former AFP chief and his wife Violeta were disproportionate to their combined income. – Peter J.G. Tabingo

 

 


     METRO NEWS

‘Evidence enough to convict Abadia’

SC defers action on Kuratong reopening

Arroyo asks businessmen to use clout to fast-track water firms’ sewerage projects

Palparan says Army general cleared soldiers who stormed mining firm


    
     TOP NEWS

NFA has importedenough rice: GMA

Gloria bares Napocor reduction of power selling price to Meralco

Pinoy farmers less productive? Not so, says IRRI

House in quandary whether to make public ‘secret’ Spratlys oil search pact

Palace has only itself to blame, says opposition

Bribery or extortion on $2B Misamis Or. project?

‘Gloria politicizing cheap drugs measure’




Please address comments and suggestions to the Webmaster.
COPYRIGHT 2004 © People's Independent Media Inc.