Y files yielded an
article by Bernardo V. Lopez titled, "Who chooses our national heroes?" He wrote
25 years ago that the controversy over the Aquino statues has given birth to a
wisecrack that goes like this:
"Aquino [Ninoy, not Cory] was walking around Metro Manila
looking for a place to set the statues. He decided to first try Luneta. When he
got there, Rizal descended from heaven and told Aquino to go try some place else
since Luneta was occupied. Rizal argued that Aquino did not die in Luneta and
that Luneta was his (Rizal’s) domain because he had been there for quite a
while. Rizal suggested that [Aquino] try the place where he died. Aquino tried
Ugarte Field next. There, he was met by Gen. Pio del Pilar who said the place
was already occupied. In despair, Aquino finally tried the tarmac at the MIA,
but was met by Galman’s spirit who told him, ‘Sorry, first come first serve’.
"When people started to think of Ninoy as a martyr to the
Filipino cause, other people worried that they’d turned him into a hero. They
said that he was given too much credit, that he was overrated. They questioned
the importance of his two statues, which drew a lot of local and international
publicity, and argued that other heroes had better claim to the places being
considered as sites for installation."
Lopez then asks: "Who chooses our national heroes? Are there
decrees or laws that proclaim them? What are the norms in determining national
heroes? What about the subjective [personal, self-serving interests] factor?
Nobody seems to really know.
"Before Aquino, no decree or law has yet proclaimed a
national hero.
"Before Aquino, the high standard of heroism was protected
from being smeared by politics and ulterior motives."
Heroes were made by people, the author continues. A
prospect’s achievements are painstakingly, accurately documented by historians
(not by powerful relatives). The conclusions are beyond reproach. These are
passed on as a legacy of a nation.
"Even if a powerful ruler proclaims his cousin [or husband or
best friend] as a national hero by decree of law, his cousin is not a hero in
the hearts of the people, in the eyes of history, no matter how the ruler forces
the issue. A hero emerges like a pimple—spontaneously, quite naturally…." Rises
as cream, without anyone’s covert or overt help.
Heroism is evidenced by a lifetime of service to humanity,
sacrifices and risk-taking for the good of the disenfranchised, the good of
most; exemplary behavior and works, both demonstrated and potential. Scruples,
love of country, protection of the masa, are among the virtues of a hero. The
pushing, urging, and heavy-handed influence of a benefactor-ruler is devious.
Political ambition, such as the reckless pursuit of the presidency, does not a
hero make. Awareness of, but inaction against exploitation of the oppressed in
his plantation, does not a hero make.
Cory Aquino’s family own one of the Philippines’ largest sugar plantations.
John Cavanagh and Robin Broad who tour-researched the Philippines for a year for
the Institute of Policy Studies (1988), wrote that they saw race horses in
Cory’s plantations living and treated better than migrant workers. "Cory Aquino
was ill-positioned to initiate the necessary land and other reforms…. Despite
President Aquino’s good intentions, so-called development programs are
victimized by old patterns of corruption, neglect, and bureaucracy." With pin-striked
economic advisers in tow, Philippine President Corazon Aquino descends on the
United States this week to drum up more investment and aid for her debt-ridden
economy. So frequent have been such borrowing trips that cartoonists at Manila’s
dailies have had a field day lampooning Cory carrying a begging bowl from one
world capital to another."