THE remaining 27 Army and Marines officers
accused in the alleged attempt to overthrow the administration
in February 2006 were arraigned by a military court on a charge
of mutiny at yesterday's resumption of court martial
proceedings.
The 27 were led by former Scout Ranger chief
Brig. Gen. Danilo Lim, and Colonels Ariel Querubin, Januario
Caringal, Orlando de Leon and Lt. Col. Custodio Parcon. Querubin
and Parcon are both recipients of the highest combat award Medal
of Valor.
The highest ranking officer, Maj. Gen. Renato
Miranda, was deemed arraigned last month after prosecution
lawyers read the charges and specification against him and
asking him what was his plea. Miranda was former Marines
commandant.
At the court martial proceedings yesterday,
the prosecution read the charges and specification on the charge
of violation of the Article of War 67 or mutiny on only seven of
the accused, including Lim and Querubin. The others waived the
reading of the charge sheets.
The accused were later asked for their plea.
Their lawyers responded with a special plea - a call for the
dismissal of the charge and specifications on the ground that
the offense filed against their clients is not a punishable act.
The 28 officers are accused of "conniving,
confederating and mutually helping one another, each committing
individual acts towards a common design or purpose, attempted to
create or begin, excite, cause or join a mutiny by withdrawing
their support" from President Arroyo.
They are also accused of urging then AFP
chief Gen. Generoso Senga and other officers and enlisted
personnel "to likewise withdraw their support from the
President, and attempting to join protest actions of the
so-called civil society groups and political oppositions calling
for the President's resignation with the intent to usurp and/or
subvert override lawful authority."
The court granted the request of the defense
lawyers to file their written petition in 15 to 20 days. The
court also allowed the prosecution to submit it response to the
defense motion, 15 to 20 days also upon receipt of motion.
Under the military justice system, the
reading of the charges and specification and asking of the
accused plea constitute arraignment. The entering of the plea of
guilty or not guilty is not part of the arraignment in the
military.
The 28 are also charged with lesser offenses
before the tribunal, including violation of the AW 96 (conduct
unbecoming an officer and a gentleman) and violation AW 97
(conduct prejudicial to good order).
The court has deferred the arraignment of the
accused on the other charges, pending discussion on whether the
lesser offenses have prescribed or not last February on the
second year of the alleged offense.
The charge of mutiny cannot prescribe.
Under the military justice system, the
charges should be deemed dropped if the accused are not
arraigned in two years from the commission of the supposed
offense.
AFP officials have said charges may not
prescribe if it is established that the delays in the
proceedings were caused by the defense.
Capt. Ruben Guinolbay addressed the court
when he was asked to stand for the arraignment. The decorated
Scout Ranger officer asked the court, presided by Maj. Gen.
Joggy Leo Fojas, to objectively look into their cases filed
against them.
"It's been two years of unjust
incarceration... two years taken off our lives, two years doing
nothing.... All I ask of you is to look at the case as what they
are... I do not ask for mercy... We are unjustly jailed and we
don't deserve a second more in detention," he said.
Guinolbay also took note of the pre-trial
advice of col. Pedro Davila, Staff Judge Advocate of AFP chief
Gen. Hermogenes Esperon, who has reversed the findings of
pre-trial investigators, dismissing the mutiny charges against
him and the other accused officers.
Esperon convened the general court martial in December 2006
on the recommendation of Davila. - Victor Reyes