OLLOWING are
portions of a press release issued by the GSIS with my comments on each:
"GSIS President and General Manager Winston Garcia demanded
yesterday (30 April 2008) full transparency and accountability in the
operations, transactions and contracts entered into by the Manila Electric
Company (Meralco)."
GSIS members are demanding the same of Garcia.
"Lamenting Meralco manage-ment’s ‘dirt rag’ treatment of GSIS
despite its four seats in the utility’s 11-member board, Garcia said the GSIS is
fed up with the lack of transparency prevailing at Meralco."
The 1.2 million GSIS members also lament the ‘dirt rag’
treatment they get and are fed up with the lack of transparency prevailing in
GSIS.
"Garcia categorically denied that GSIS is out to wrest
control of Meralco either for itself or for the Philippine government,
explaining that the latter has a long-standing privatization policy."
Thank heavens!
***
Jack Smith Jr. (Jack.Smith@-lacity.org) whose 87-year-old
father has not received his GSIS pension for a long time now, wrote:
"We’ve been writing letters and making phone calls (to GSIS)
without success. Letters and phone calls are not answered. But through your
newspaper we can now at least see some silver lining for the
pensioners/retirees. I suggest that the pensioners/retirees will commit to
memory the name of Ms. Ella Valencerina, vice president, Public Affairs Office,
for her ‘instant action’ to help them. I hope she will imbue this laudable
public service attitude to her staff. Although we still have not actually
received the cold cash, we’re happy with the thought that someone is ‘helping
us’. Again, in behalf of my father Jack P. Smith and the entire Smith clan,
thank you Mr. Arcilla for providing us the forum to ventilate our frustration.
To Ms. Valencerina, thank you and wishing for your continued support to all
pensioners and retirees. To Malaya, more power and continued success."
You are welcome, Jack. I hope that as of this writing, your
father has already received his long overdue pension. Sad to say though that
Ambassador Rodolfo Arizala, Ms. Julieta Posadas, Ms. Soledad Parial and Floro
Pimentel, old-age pensioners all, have not yet received any feedback from the
GSIS.
Neither have Valeriano Almazan
(valeriano_almazan@yahoo.com),
Eduardo Jimmy P. Quilang
(ejpquilang@philrice.gov.ph), Eusebio Dizon
(drbongdizon@yahoo.com), Ms. Sylvia
P. Reyes (spmreyes612@yahoo.com),
Rommel Rodriguez (rodriguez.rommel@gmail.com)
and Benjamin Gerodias
(bs23gerodias@yahoo.com).
Wouldn’t we all be happy to hear from Ms. Valencerina soon?
***
Due to their great number, there must be some grain of truth
in the complaints I receive periodically from Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA)
personnel.
The complaints concern foreign assignments, cross-postings,
extensions of tours of duty abroad, extensions of services well beyond the
retirement age of 65, promotions, favoritism, etc.
To be sure, such complaints existed even before the watch of
Foreign Secretary Alberto Romulo. The big difference between then and now lies
mainly in the number of complaints and in the degree of the consequent
demoralization among the staff.
Romulo’s defenders claim that never in the history of the DFA
has so many benefits through salary and allowance increases had come the way of
the DFA staffers. Maybe, but that is really nothing to crow about since that’s
part of his job and everyone enjoys them, including the favored ones.
In any case, that is no justification for the numerous
infractions of existing rules and regulations. Never in the history of the DFA
have there been more extensions of the six-year tour of duty of personnel
assigned abroad or extensions of services of personnel beyond 65 years of age
than now. Neither have there been more cases of favoritism or more political
ambassadors appointed than now.
I realize that not all of these infractions were of Romulo’s
own doing, just as he wasn’t really the only one responsible for the adjustments
in allowances. His predecessors laid the groundwork for them.
But has he ever taken the time to personally review papers
given to him for signature and approval by his immediate staff, instead of
completely relying on their word?
Or has he ever stood up to his boss and other power-wielders
and told them that what they want were not only illegal but will also cause
widespread demoralization in the Department?
Or is he only interested in saving his job? Surely, he must
realize that blindly following such orders or requests will not ensure his
indefinite stay in the cabinet. The appointing authority has other things to
consider. Is he safe in the impending cabinet revamp?
***
Speaking of the cabinet revamp, the consensus is that it is
nothing to look forward to. To begin with, what can a new cabinet secretary
meaningfully accomplish in the last two minutes of Arroyo’s regime? If it is
solely meant to pay political debts, everybody believes it shouldn’t be done. It
will only prove more expensive and damaging to poor Juan dela Cruz.
Incidentally, a little bird told me that retiring AFP chief
Gen. Hermogenes Esperon reportedly wants to head the Subic Bay Metropolitan
Authority (SBMA). If true and he is appointed as such, he will have a fixed
tenure of six years, thus making it technically difficult, if not impossible,
for the next chief executive to dismiss him. Ok, Sir!
***
Ms. Gloria Arroyo’s directive to dole out P1,400 every month
to some 300,000 poor families is either hare-brained or a really smart move or
both.
Seeing as she fancies herself as a good economist, I’m sure
she knows it is hare-brained. She knows it is a band-aid solution to a looming
economic crisis in our midst.
That she did it just the same proves she is not the bad
politician that she claims she is.
As columnist Antonio Abaya said recently, with the Cha-cha
train seemingly chug-chugging inexorably to its unknown ultimate destination
before 2010, courtesy of Senator Aquilino Pimentel Jr., the dole-out scheme
definitely could only redound to the benefit of Arroyo and her minions at
absolutely no expense to them!
Having invited the House whose majority is pro-Arroyo to join
in, what makes Pimentel think the cha-cha train will not head in the direction
of a parliamentary instead of a federal form of government?
As Mr. Abaya suggests, what can stop Ms. Arroyo from doing a
Putin in such an eventuality. (Russian President Vladimir Putin, barred from
running for another term, "installed" his crony as president and made himself
prime minister.)
***
Senate Blue Ribbon committee chairman Alan Cayetano has
ordered the preparation of the report on the odious ZTE-NBN deal hearings even
before the Supreme Court has decided on the Senate’s motion for reconsideration
(MR) of the tribunal’s decision on the invocation of executive privilege by Ms.
Arroyo via CHED chairman Romulo Neri.
(It makes you wonder – does Press Secretary Ignacio "Two
Tapes" Bunye have a point when he said that all the Senate hearings are held
only in "aid of grandstanding"?)
Does Cayetano know that the Supreme Court will deny the MR?
What if it doesn’t? Does he then reconvene the hearings?
I think Cayetano should wait for the Supreme Court decision
at least before rendering a report on the hearings.
***
Today is the 8th day of the second year of Jonas Burgos’
disappearance.
I have said it before and I will keep on saying it: When all is said and
done, it will be the extrajudicial killings and the enforced disappearances that
will continue to haunt Ms. Arroyo long after she is no longer in power.