re genetically
modified or bio-engineered organisms (GMOs) and hybrid varieties the answer to
the food crisis that is now enveloping the world? Some people say yes, others
say no. The issue of GMOs has remained controversial. The production of hybrids
that show hybrid vigor has preceded the creation of GMOs. Classical genetics has
demonstrated the gains to be expected from hybrids compared to the parent
species or varieties, but still some concerns have persisted.
The present focus on the rice crisis, which is explained by
the government as due to trade manipulations rather than scarcity (which many
cannot believe because government continues to import rice), has brought to the
fore the use of appropriate rice varieties adapted to varying environmental
conditions. Rice varieties adapted to drought or marshy conditions, I
understand, are being developed as answer to anticipated climate changes, which
would render many rice-producing areas of the world either dry or wet. Other
rice breeders aim to develop varieties adapted to saline soil conditions, should
coastal areas become salty as a result of rising sea levels.
Because of the looming food crisis, some groups are pushing
for the adoption of hybrids that under certain conditions produce yields at
least 50 percent higher than non-hybrids. CNN recently featured the practice in
Indonesia of using high-yielding hybrids and organic fertilizers bringing more
income to rice farmers. But the same announcement also pointed out that
Indonesian farmers have to rely on the importation of hybrid seeds. Seed
importation is seen as a disadvantage of planting hybrid rice.
In the Philippines, the use of hybrid rice seeds produced
with a variety from China is being recommended to help ensure rice sufficiency
in the country. Again, the objective is to increase yields. The question is,
what are the demands of this hybrid on the environment and are they affordable
in the long term?
One criticism of hybrid or bio-engineered rice is that these
varieties require certain environmental conditions and the use of inorganic
fertilizers and pesticides that are generally believed to be harmful to the
environment or add to the cost of production and therefore cannot be
sustainable. It is obvious that yields alone cannot be used as arguments for
adopting certain varieties of crop species. Sustainability of the environment
should be factored in the choice of appropriate varieties.
One bio-engineered crop variety being planted in some parts
of the Philippines is Bt corn. I understand that some farmers plant this GMO in
some areas on Mindanao. But farmers in other parts of the country have refused
to plant it because they feel that this GMO has not been studied enough and
shown to be environment-friendly. The bacterial gene inserted into this corn GMO
kills not only harmful insects but also useful ones. Others argue that
environmental conditions, such as water and organic fertilizers, can ensure
large harvests, and there is no need to resort to engineered varieties.
The use of GMOs and hybrids is not without risks. These risks should be taken
into consideration in making decisions on their adoption.