BY JOCELYN MONTEMAYOR
PRESS Secretary Ignacio Bunye yesterday
reiterated that Mala-cañang is not after the Manila Electric Co
(Meralco) but the observance of responsible business practices
and the lowering of power costs.
"Just to answer some critics, this is not
about Meralco. This is about making ourselves competitive. This
is about engaging in responsible corporate practices and this is
about being responsible for practices that may have affected
public interest," he said at a forum.
The President’s allies in the Kabalikat ng
Malayang Pilipino (Kampi) party have threatened to file a class
suit against Meralco if it does not refund customers for passing
on to them their systems loss.
The political opposition has said the
government was just "squeezing" Meralco to get back at its
sister company ABS-CBN broadcast network which has been critical
of the government’s restrictions on media.
Bunye said the government is reviewing the
power generation set-up, including the "parts of the electricity
generating and distribution chain," to determine what must be
done to lower the cost of electricity.
He said the review of the set-up also aims to
provide inputs to the proposed amendments to the Electric Power
Industry and Reform Act or Epira law.
Bunye hedged when asked if Malacañang would
support the proposal of congressmen for Meralco to refund the
charges for the systems loss, saying "this is about corporate
responsibility, this is about taking responsibility for
activities and decisions which could have affected the public in
an adverse manner."
Meralco officials during the Joint
Congressional Power Commission last Monday admitted the
inclusion of the 72 million kilowatt-hours of electricity that
they consume in the "system loss" charge imposed on consumers,
which amounts to about half a billion pesos annually.
System loss is that portion of electricity
which is pilfered or is lost during transmission.
Speaker Prospero Nograles urged the Energy
Regulatory Commission to order Meralco to refund its consumers.
"The ERC should find out through their public
hearings what actions they should take (against Meralco)," he
said.
Nograles said the ERC should look into
reports that Meralco overcharged its customers last April when
it charged P4.9043 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) despite buying
electricity from the National Power Corp. (Napocor) for only
P4.01/kWh.
If true, he said, Meralco overcharged its
customers P0.89/kWh just for the month of April alone.
Citing figures from Meralco’s website, Pete
Ilagan, president of National Association of Electricity
Consumers for Reforms, Inc. (Nasecore), said the Lopez-owned
power distributor even increased its rates by P0.52/kWh last
April from P4.3885/kWh in March to P4.9043.
"Meralco should refund the eighty-nine
centavos with dispatch or face more public outrage," said Manila
Rep. Amado Bagatsing (Kampi).
Kampi president Luis Villafuerte (Camarines
Sur) has said the refund must include the "systems loss" charges
where consumers are charged nearly half a billion pesos a year.
Villafuerte, in a privilege speech on
Wednesday, said the Lopez-owned First Gas, a power generating
company, also overcharged Meralco for two-and-half years after
its start-up in 2000 with billings for "ghost" deliveries of
P12.99 billion a year.
The cost of the "ghost" deliveries under
Meralco’s power purchase agreement was passed on to consumers.
Villafuerte said the overcharges started in
June 2000 and lasted up to December 2002 when Meralco paid for
power averaging 1,000 megawatts.
FINANCIAL CRACKDOWN
Rep. Liza Maza (Gabriela) denounced
Malacañang’s alleged use of assets of the Government Insurance
Service System in its bid to get back at the Lopez family. GSIS
has a 33 percent stake in Meralco.
"Malacañang should stop pitting government
employees’ funds for this apparent financial crackdown on
business and media institutions that refuse to toe the line,"
she said.
Maza said GSIS president and general manager
Winston Garcia "is the last person who can speak for the
interests of government employees, having repeatedly gambled
government employees’ money in various speculative investments
without consultation, while ignoring appeals for efficiency and
transparency in the delivery of services."
"Instead of utilizing GSIS funds in this
crackdown, it should instead be maximized for the increase of
dividends, the delivery of retirement and pension benefits for
government employees," she said.
The Gabriela party list group last year filed
a resolution for an investigation into the GSIS’ "global fund
management program" which allows foreign investments firms and
private international fund managers to handle its funds.
"The Garcia-led GSIS has been plagued with complaints of
non-remittance of benefits and pensions, of a top-heavy,
over-compensated management, and of entering into unwise
investments to the detriment of government employees. With this
track record, can we trust them with the management of a public
utility?" Maza said. – With Wendell Vigilia