t was Robert
Kennedy, I think, who first used this title publicly – or at least used it as a
title of a book which he had written about his experience investigating the
Mafia while the chief legal counsel of a Senate committee which was chaired by
his brother, then-Massachusetts Senator John F. Kennedy.
I often think about the profound implications of the title
whenever I think of our society – as a whole and in its key parts (political,
economic, civic or social) and whenever I wonder why we are who, why and where
we are and whether things could ever get better.
Having seen one functioning democracy exercise its right to
vote up close, I am now even more moved to wonder whether our biggest problem
simply is the enemy within – our very own selves.
We cannot escape collective responsibility for our current
conditions or situation. One of our biggest hurdles to improvement has always
been individual and group attempts to just do that.
And our problems are manifest in small things, small everyday
things. They demonstrate how each of us is a subversive, with what we do helping
(intentionally or not) to undermine the society we all say we wish to improve.
Let me try to explain by highlighting one situation and
demonstrating how inter-linked everything is and how this inter-link inevitably
leads straight to you and to me.
My favorite everyday example of subversives within begins
with our traffic enforcers.
One simple way by which society demonstrates control, imposes
order and guarantees stability and assures regularity is through the lowly
traffic signal light. Consisting of three colors – red, yellow and green – the
traffic signal light is a visible tool used to communicate to every motorist the
simple message that in due time his or her interests will be met. And isn’t that
interest – to get across an intersection – a very simple one?
Here, though, is how we complicate it, and begin to subvert
the whole structure of control and order and stability and regularity.
Very often, we as motorists read the traffic signal in a very
narrow and very selfish manner, especially the color green. Every elementary
school child knows that green means "go", means that we can move forward – and
like elementary school children go and move forward we do when confronted with
the green signal light. But wait: what if up ahead us, everyone who had gone
forward before us have now effectively clogged up the intersection and are right
smack in the middle, unable to move forward? Our simplistic instincts tell us:
we must still go forward, first because the light is still green and second
because if we don’t, we could get stuck in the traffic jam building up. So we
move forward, contributing to that traffic jam we were afraid of in the first
place.
And thus we find ourselves stuck there, in the middle of the
intersection, just when the light turns yellow, and then red. Naturally, as our
light turns red, someone else’s turns green. And that someone else starts to
react naturally, moving forward. But wait! He or she couldn’t move forward much,
because there we are, stuck in the middle. And so this new motorist honks his
horn – his signal light says green and green means go and how dare we block his
way? Finally, we are able to move, but now, as the second motorist crosses the
intersection he is confronted by a third – the guy behind us – whose signal
light has since turned green!
Here’s more: things are not helped any by our traffic
enforcers, many of whom decide to take matters into their own hands and direct
traffic at will.
There is nothing inherently bad in that – except when right
above the traffic enforcer the traffic signal light is still operating normally
and the traffic enforcer ignores the signals.
I have had countless arguments with traffic enforcers at
intersections about this. I have appealed to them, sometimes yelled at them, to
switch off the traffic signal lights if they are to manually direct traffic, so
as not to undermine and subvert the traffic signal light system. Not
surprisingly, they don’t get it. I remember how, in 1981 when I was a student
visiting Germany I noticed how some traffic lights at intersections were hooded;
curious, I inquired and was told that a hooded light was a message to motorists
to proceed at will. (In some other areas they are just left to blink.) The hood
conveyed a very important message: with it, the motorist is left to his own
devices to navigate the streets; without it, he must follow the signal light’s
command. I smile remembering how much care the Germans put into trying to keep
intact the credibility of their traffic signal light system; my smile turns to a
slow and sad shake of my head when I think of how, I the eyes of the Filipino
motorist, our traffic signal lights are hooded, everyday!
And so, very soon, to many motorists the signal lights mean
nothing. Very soon the principle that matters to motorists is "every man to
himself." And very quickly, the very expensive system of traffic signal lights
and the process behind it that we have set up to try to put some sense of order
and control and stability and regularity into our traffic situation simply
crumbles.
Now think of other processes of government – paying taxes,
voting, etc. – and substitute them in the place of the traffic signal light and
you see why in totality our society is in such a mess.
Indeed the whole logic and structure of government is meant
to move people away from the basic "everyman to himself" principle of survival
to a more structured and communal system. The more successful societies where
the interests of the community are better addressed are those where that move
has been far more advanced.
If we are to be honest with ourselves – whether it is the
everyday manners of a motorist or the corrupt ways of a government official, it
is very clear that ours remains an "everyman to himself" society, with processes
and procedures like the traffic signal light simply there to give us the
trappings or the appearance of a more civilized order.
The enemy of good governance and a more progressive society is within each
and every one of us.