s we prepare for
computerization for the 2010 elections and watch with awe at how fast they have
their results available, let us not forget that we have ACMs (Automatic Counting
Machines) in storage at an air-conditioned warehouse maintained by the
Commission on Elections. These ACMs can do the job – and do it better than many
of the systems that the Comelec is looking at.
Those ACMs – each and every ACM – were tested and passed by
our Department of Science and Technology (DOST) with 100 percent accuracy and
reliability.
Our obviously political Supreme Court decided, however, based
solely on the firm belief that Gloria Arroyo would lose to Fernando Poe Jr.,
then the most popular person in the Philippines, if the results were known by
noon of the next day after the elections. Thus, the SC, in its decision noted
that the Comelec had "put at grave risk the holding of credible and peaceful
elections by shoddily accepting electronic hardware and software." Thus, GMA
(with the help of a couple of Garcis and military operators won in 2004, with
the active participation of the Supreme Court), handily won that election.
But that is water under the bridge even if what could very
well be the best electoral automatic counting machines for us are sitting in
warehouse – forbidden to be used.
(Why do we never learn? Those ACMs are in the exact same
situation that the Nuclear Power Plant – that could have solved all our power
problems – which was also never used primarily because of politics.)
What is the danger now is that the Comelec is looking at ACMs
and other equipment from the United States which even just in their last
elections were proven to be unreliable.
From Minnesota, for instance, we have the example of the ES&S
M-100, a precinct-based optical scanner. That same scanner was found to have
failed pre-election "logic and accuracy testing." The M-100 "reported
inconsistent vote totals," such that "the same ballots run through the same
machines, yielded different results each time."
Two of Minnesota’s three largest counties (Anoka and Dakota)
use the Diebold AccuVote OS scanners to "count" their ballots. That system is
the same one seen being hacked via its memory card in the Emmy-nominated HBO
documentary "Hacking Democracy."
The Diebold op-scanner was also used in the New Hampshire
(NH) primary when pre-election polls and exit polls determined Obama would be
the winner, only to see him lose to Hillary Clinton. Obama was found to have won
in the 20 percent of NH which counts their ballots by hand. While Clinton won,
in the 80 percent of NH that used the Diebold op-scan system which has been
proven to be easily hackable.
In fact, Diebold has admitted, in response to a lawsuit by
the state of Ohio, that their GEMS central tabulator system routinely drops
thousands of votes, without giving notice, while they are being uploaded from
memory cards to the main server. That failed tabulator model was used in some 34
states in the last elections in the US.
Because of the use of these machines, in Minnesota the race
between Al Franken and Norm Coleman for a Senate seat is going through a recount
– because the Diebolds cannot be trusted to give the right totals.
Other Senate races still in question are in Alaska, Georgia
and Oregon.
Alaska Republican Senator Ted Stevens is leading Democratic
Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich by 48.2 percent to 46.7 percent. Some 49,000
absentee, early votes and provisional ballots remain to be counted. Alaska uses
optical-scan machines made by Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold)
statewide.
Alaska is one of the few places where the Democratic Party
actually went to court to fight for transparency successfully suing the state
for the release of Diebold databases detailing how voters voted in the 2004
election. Alaska refused to release these because of "security concerns."
In Georgia, incumbent Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss
seized only 49.9 percent of votes so far, narrowly missing the 50 percent
majority that is required in Georgia to avoid a runoff. But, some 50,000
absentee and other ballots are still being counted. Georgia uses AccuVote
paperless touch screen machines made by Premier Election Solutions statewide.
Georgia was the first to adopt Diebold’s wholly unverifiable
touch-screen systems across the entire state. Maryland which also adopted the
paperless system has since decided to replace the system with paper-based
optical systems, following scientific report after report warning about failure
after failure with those Diebold touch-screen systems.
In Oregon, incumbent Republican Senator Gordon Smith leads
Democratic challenger Jeff Merkley by less than 1 percent. Oregon uses mail-in
paper ballots statewide. It’s the only state that has gone entirely postal. The
delay is simply the result of the manual counting of the "snail mail."
The move to Vote-by-Mail was brought about by problems with
touch-screen voting machines.
We have a situation where we have perfectly good ACMs rotting
in a warehouse which have been bought and paid for and for which the money
already paid will never be returned since the seller delivered on time and
passed all the tests prior to being paid. Does the SC decision that these ACMs
will not work, despite the certification of the DOST that in fact they work very
well, after each machine had been meticulously tested by the DOST negate the
reality that the men of science in the DOST are more competent to say what
technology or equipment will or will not work than the lawyers who are appointed
by GMA as justices of the SC?
Seeing how the present Comelec seems to be charging pell-mell
into spending P21 billion on what could well be systems that will fail as they
have in America, it seems only right for people to realize where the present
Comelec may be headed. I am not even yet speculating on how much of that P21
billion may end up in commissioners’. senators’ or congressmen’s’ pockets. For
now, it is enough to advise caution and a lot of technological testing before
finally choosing what they will buy.
Among the proofs that they are on the right track would be for them to take
the mothballs from those ACMs in the Comelec storeroom and test them against the
other suggested systems. And if the SC objects, to hell with the Supreme Court.
The revered justices of the court do not have the technical capability to test
even just everyday technological equipment such as cell phones and laptops; what
more ACMs?