HE TRIUMPH OF
Barack Hussein Obama as the first ever Black president of the United States of
America, was doubtlessly an epic feat, unimaginable long, long ago.
Indeed, the 47-year-old senator from Illinois won the
longest, not to say fightingest, election in American history, after he toppled
two formidable rivals, namely, Senator Hillary Clinton during the Democratic
Party’s nomination campaign, and Senator John McCain, the 71-year-old nominee of
the Republican Party, during the presidential race to the White House.
Soon after his stunning victory last Tuesday, Obama was
swamped by an avalanche of accolades from Americans and other peoples all over
the world for succeeding in his improbable quest to become the first
African-American president.
"Barack Obama broke the racial barrier for all Americans,"
one of them enthusiastically proclaimed. "An extraordinary victory," said
another. Numerous others called it "a stunning victory," "genuinely historic,"
"a transitional movement in American political history" and so on.
The best tribute came from a professor of law at the
Northwestern University: "The historic election of Barack Obama means that the
American dream is alive and well and thriving and that anyone, of any race or
ethnic background, can rise in American life and politics – the presidency
itself!"
And so, Barack Obama, son of a Kenyan and a white American,
is now the 44th US president, not just of those who elected him, who backed him
with enormous campaign funds, but of all American citizens, be they Democrats,
Republicans alike, and the so-called independent, undecided, and last-minute
voters in all 50 states of the American union.
Naturally, there followed much serious discussions and
analyses by the usual suspects, you know, political observers and analysts, and
voluble commentators in the media establishment in the US and elsewhere in world
capitals, Paris, London, Moscow, and Manila. They tried to delve into how Obama
won and why McCain lost his bid to become the oldest ever president against his
younger rival.
Many of them seem to agree that the economic collapse, which
occurred in the middle of the hotly-contested presidential race, was the impetus
that transformed a solid Democratic year to a landslide by Obama.
But even before that the victory of Obama and the Democrats
was assured in large part by an unpopular war in Iraq, a Republican culture of
incompetence, and a philosophic and ideological shallowness, according to one
perceptive political observer. Not only this, the Republican camp bungled the
campaign, and, despite his effort to keep his distance from George W. Bush,
McCain faced a difficult task to win as his party’s candidate in the wake of
failed administration of Bush.
The central question, now that he has emerged the victor, is:
Will President-elect Obama’s conciliatory and open-minded rhetoric that he
displayed in his acceptance speech carry the day in a Democratically-dominated
government, or will the "killer instinct" of some long-frustrated Democrats take
over, and will he draw out the support of the minority Republican senators?
Anyway, when Obama ascends the presidency on January 20,
2009, he will find out that he won’t have time to catch his breath. He will
immediately begin the arduous work of turning his campaign promises into a
viable agenda.
Oh, of course, Obama is fully aware that he has inherited
neither peace nor prosperity for the country, but rather the toughest
environment for a new president. He takes over the most powerful office in the
world land with his nation in the grip of the worst economic crisis in decades
and enmeshed in two wars.
As a matter of fact, as those of us who have long observed American politics
for years, this is the first time when a president has to tackle major crises in
national security and economic policy at the same time!