BY EVANGELINE DE VERA
THE family of missing activist Jonas Burgos
yesterday won the first round in the habeas corpus case that
his mother filed before the Court of Appeals against President
Arroyo and officials of the Armed Forces.
In a seven-page decision penned by
Associate Justice Rosalinda Asuncion-Vicente, the CA Seventh
Division affirmed its order for the military to produce an
investigation report of Col. Arthur Abadilla, AFP provost
marshal, which the family says may have a link to the
disappearance of Burgos.
The appellate court dismissed for lack of
merit the motion filed by the Office of the Solicitor General
on behalf of government seeking to quash the subpoena duces
tecum and ad testificandum on Abadilla’s report.
The CA said it found no justifiable reason
to quash the subpoena, adding the motion to quash has become
moot and academic as Abadilla has already appeared and
testified in court, except for his reservation that he could
not submit the investigation report without clearance from his
superior.
"Respondents failed to show how the
disclosure of the matters contained in the Provost Marshal’s
report would lead to such undesirable results. If any, the
disclosure of the contents of the investigation report might
show the involvement of AFP officers and personnel in the
purported loss of the subject plate number and the disclosure
that might cause embarrassment to the persons involved in the
investigation," the CA ruled.
Abadilla has said that his report was
irrelevant to Burgos’ disappearance because it was about the
administrative liability of officers of the 56th Infantry
Battalion for the loss of license plates TAB-194 in their
custody. The plates were originally attached to an XLT jeep
impounded at the 56th IB headquarters in Norzagaray, Bulacan
since June last year. The plates were seen on a maroon Toyota
Revo used by unidentified men who snatched Burgos from a
restaurant at the Ever Gotesco mall in Quezon City on April
28.
The military has said the plates could have
been stolen.
The CA said Abadilla’s report "would
definitely shed light" on how the license plates ended up in
the vehicle used in the abduction.
Dr. Edita Burgos said the CA decision is a
major victory, but raised the possibility of other blocks
before the report is released to the court.
The appeals court likewise junked the
submission of Acting Solicitor General Amparo Tang that the
subpoena was oppressive and unreasonable based on the alleged
confidential nature of the report.
The OSG has said the release of the report
would subject the provost marshal to possible administrative
and criminal liability as the document is covered a 1964
memorandum circular which prohibits the disclosure of certain
information or material that would be prejudicial to the
interest or prestige of the nation or any government activity,
or would cause administrative embarrassment or unwarranted
injury to an individual or would be of advantage to a foreign
nation.
"This Court is not ready to order the
quashing of the subpoena merely because it would cause
embarrassment to those AFP officers or personnel who made it
possible for the abductors to possess and utilize the subject
plate number in Burgos’ abduction. His liberty, or maybe even
his life, which is at stake in the present petition for habeas
corpus, takes primordial importance over those reasons being
raised by respondents," the CA said.
Abadilla has told the court he no longer
has control over the report because he has submitted it to AFP
chief Gen. Hermogenes Esperon Jr.
The CA has ordered Abadilla to secure permission from
Esperon to present the document before the court and to
testify on its contents. The order was opposed by the OSG.