he husband of
Republi-can Party vice presiden-tial candidate Sarah Palin will be issued a
subpoena by Alaska bipartisan lawmakers. The Judiciary Committee also decided to
issue subpoenas for a dozen other witnesses, most of them current and former
members of the Alaska Governor Palin’s administration. The Alaska Bipartisan
Legislative Panel voted to probe the alleged impropriety of Palin’s attempt to
fire a policeman and the public safety Commissioner.
The independent investigator said he had reason to suspect
that Palin’s staff had pressured a private state contractor to deny a workman’s
compensation claim filed by policeman Mike Wooten who divorced Palin’s sister.
From the Wall Street Journal by J. Millman: "The
investigation began before Republican John McCain chose Palin as his
vice-presidential running mate. Previously, the probe had focused on whether the
governor’s office exerted undue pressure on the state police to dismiss Mr.
Wooten, and whether the governor fired her public safety commissioner, Walt
Monegan, because he refused to do so.
"The Alaska state troopers’ union has alleged in a complaint
that aides improperly searched Mr. Wooten’s confidential personnel file looking
for damaging information."
Palin backers worked hard so that the subpoena will not
happen until after the November 4 presidential election. But the Alaska
Bipartisan Legislative Panel deemed to go on with the subpoena right away and
not wait for after the election. Palin’s husband, Todd, and other witnesses will
be forced by a Republican-controlled Judiciary Committee to answer questions
from the investigator.
Palin, running out of intelligent announcements, now says
Senator Barack Obama regrets not picking Senator Clinton for his vice
presidential running mate. Didn’t it occur to Palin that there are reasons
unknown to her why Obama and Clinton agreed not to team-up? He has other plans.
She has other plans. Palin, the small-town mayor and 19-month governor of uh…
Alaska, was an unknown until two weeks ago and could not have been privy to
long-range plans of the Democratic Party.
Everything known about the two couldn’t be more opposite.
Senator Clinton’s position on women’s issues is cerebral. Palin’s position on
the issue of reproductive health care and abortion rights are diametrically
opposite of Senator Clinton’s. Senator Clinton, raising a prudent daughter,
professes that teenagers ought to learn sex in the appropriate venue. Palin
disagrees. Palin does not want youngsters to learn about sex. Has Palin named a
venue for teenagers to learn about sex?
Palin was then the accuser of Senator Clinton for whining,
being a whiner: "[Clinton has] to know what she is getting into… when I hear a
statement like that coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived
whine about that excess criticism, or, you know, maybe a sharper microscope put
on her, I think, that does not do us any good–women in politics." This is
Palin’s analysis of Senator Clinton. Palin’s analysis is not very clear…a bit,
like, garbled… like, Valley-Girl talk with "you know" and "I think." This was
Palin’s message to Senator Clinton in the past.
Today, with Senator Clinton out of the race, Palin has turned
around. Palin sounds like she’s talking about a dear friend Senator Clinton:
"What determination, and grit, and even grace through some tough shots that were
fired her way–[Senator Clinton] handled those well…."
New York Times: "Palin’s visceral style and penchant for attacking
critics–she sometimes calls local opponent "haters"–contrasts with her carefully
crated public image. Throughout her career, she has pursued vendettas, fired
officials who crossed her and sometimes blurred the line between government and
personal grievance, according to a review of public records and interviews with
60 Republicans and Democratic legislators and local officials."