COURT of Appeals Associate Justice Jose
Sabio Jr. yesterday reaffirmed his affidavit before the
justice department that businessman Francis de Borja tried to
bribe him with P10 million in exchange for his inhibition from
the Meralco ownership case.
"I am pursuing this case if only to prove
to all and sundry that (the bribe offer) was not a figment of
my imagination and that what transpired was an attempt to
bribe me," he told the panel.
Sabio said De Borja called his cellphone
last July 1 and offered the money in exchange for
relinquishing the chairmanship of the 8th division to give way
to its regular chairman, Justice Bienvenido Reyes, who was
then returning from a leave of absence.
"He (De Borja) kept pestering me with text
messages telling me to meet with him. He said that I should
accept the money since there was nothing heinous about what
they were asking me to do, I will only have to relinquish the
chairmanship. But I said no," he said.
Sabio said he was not able to save De
Borja’s text messages but asked the panel to consider as
evidence his text messages to his daughter wherein he told her
of the bribe offer.
On July 3, Sabio said he called up De Borja
to stop bothering him but the latter was persistent.
Sabio said he finally agreed to meet De
Borja right after his ethics class at the Ateneo Law School.
Though he did not mention it in his
affidavit, Sabio said he now recalled that at the time of
their meeting, De Borja was carrying a medium-sized brown bag
which he said must have contained the money.
Sabio’s counsel Vicente Chuidian informed
the panel that they intend to file a motion to expand the
scope or coverage of the probe to include De Borja’s alleged
co-conspirators.
"I have no personal knowledge about the
bribe offer, but I guess the panel will have to investigate
deeper. What or who are the logical sources of the money? Who
will likely make the offer?" he said.
Asked if Meralco chairman Manuel Lopez,
whose name De Borja allegedly dropped as source of the money,
will be summoned during the hearing, panel chair Ernesto
Pineda said he (Lopez) is a "stranger to the bribery case,
unless he is presented as a defense witness by De Borja."
Pineda said a subpoena will be issued to De
Borja and Sabio’s daughter, Sylvia Jo, a researcher at the
office of Chief Justice Reynato Puno, to appear in the next
hearing on Friday. Evelyn Clavano, who is related to the
Sabios, will be asked to appear at a later date to testify
whether De Borja asked her for Sabio’s cellphone number.
Sabio came out in public for the first time
since the Supreme Court last Sept. 9 upheld the recommendation
of a three-man panel created by the tribunal to suspend him
for two months for simple misconduct and conduct unbecoming of
a justice for discussing the Meralco case with his older
brother, Camilo who is chairman of the Presidential Commission
on Good Government.
Sabio also belittled the impending
disbarment of his brother for trying to influence him on the
case. The high court has referred to the Bar Confidante the
actions of Camilo Sabio for influencing the judgment of a
member of the judiciary in a pending case.
Justice Sabio said the media is working
against him and this was the handiwork of the two PR firms
hired by Meralco to discredit him.
"It’s already established that De Borja
tried to bribe me. These are squid tactics to bury the whole
issue of corruption, let’s not cloud the issue. What’s so
wrong about my brother calling me?" he insisted.
He said he is not yet sure if he will file
a motion for reconsideration over his two-month suspension.
The SC’s per curiam decision ordered the
dismissal of Associate Justice Vicente Roxas, ponente of the
controversial July 23 decision granting the Meralco petition
to deny the Securities and Exchange Commission the
jurisdiction in the complaint filed by GSIS over the counting
of proxy votes of the Lopez bloc in the Meralco stockholders
meeting last May 28.
The SC severely reprimanded CA Presiding Justice Conrado
Vasquez Jr. for his indecisiveness while Associate Justice
Bienvenido Reyes meted with a reprimand. Associate Justice
Myrna Dimaranan-Vidal was admonished by the Court to be more
circumspect in the discharge of her judicial functions.
– Evangeline de Vera