BY WENDELL VIGILIA
THE former head of the government peace panel
with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front yesterday warned that the
government’s continuing failure to secure a final peace
agreement with the secessionists would give rise to a new breed
of Muslim extremists espousing "jihadist activism."
"We might be seeing a new dimension of
conflict inspired by new jihadist activism," said Rodolfo
Garcia, former chairman of the now disbanded peace panel.
President Arroyo dissolved the panel early
this month after deciding to abandon the memorandum of agreement
on ancestral domain with the MILF. The MOA was supposed to be
signed in Kuala Lumpur August 5 but the Supreme Court issued a
temporary restraining order. The tribunal is hearing questions
on the constitutionality of the agreement which will create a
Muslim homeland, among others.
The government has announced a shift in peace
policy – from negotiations with armed groups to consultations
with stakeholders with priority on the disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration of the rebel groups.
It said results of the consultations will
determine if the government would resume talks with the MILF.
Garcia, a former AFP vice chief, told a forum
at the UP School of Economics that extremists might strike once
the negotiations get even more protracted or worse, if these
fail ultimately.
"It would be a quantum leap from the level of
conflict (that) we’ve known in the past," he said. "The
resultant damages may be bigger than one can imagine."
Garcia said the new breed of rebels,
including the groups of renegade MILF Commander Ameril Umbra
Kato and Abdurahman Macapaar alias Commander Bravo "will be a
harder group to deal with."
The groups launched attacks in North Cotabato
and Lanao del Norte in the part two months.
Garcia said the bungled negotiations with the
MILF was the "last opportunity presented to us to settle a
lingering problem before the leaders of the MILF whom we were
dealing with fade away to give way to a younger generation of
leaders more impatient, deeply suspicious and distrustful of
government and with a more progressive, activist, and possessed
of a dangerous disposition."
He said that had the government created a
"peace constituency" earlier as recommended by the Philippine
Human Development Report (PHDR) in 2005, the MOA would not have
been attacked.
"Perhaps the MOA could not have been
bedeviled for what it is not. Perhaps many unfounded suspicions
and fears stoked by its oppositors could not have resulted in
hysteric outcries," he said.
While it came late, Garcia said Arroyo’s
order for a wide-ranging consultation with Mindanao stakeholders
was still the logical tact to take.
"Through nationwide constituency, engagements
with civil society organizations, communities, schools, vital
and influential sectors, business, religious, academe, sectors
with stakes and which will reap the dividends of peace, that
momentum may be maintained," he said.
Garcia defended the peace panel, saying the
crafters of the MOA merely adopted an approach "that refused to
be boxed in by the obtuse traditional approaches and experiments
of the pasts which were widely assessed to have failed to
deliver all the aspirations of the Bangsamoro."
He said the MOA was a "bold, out-of-the-box
tack" which aimed to distinguish between the legitimate
aspirations of a minority people and the non-negotiable
requirements of Philippine sovereignty and territorial
integrity."
He noted some of the provisions of the MOA
contained recommendations of the 2005 PHDR.
Garcia lamented the MOA was much-demonized
and called many names, like "a sellout, a dismemberment of the
Republic, virtual grant of independence to Bangsamoro, a pact
that is unconstitutional."
He also took a swipe at politicians who
opposed the MOA, saying some of them were just doing it for
politics.
"A public with a clear understanding of the
roots of the Moro problem, aware of the injustice and indignity
suffered by their people, aggravated by poverty, deprivation and
ignorance engendered by an inadequacy of opportunities or worse,
of opportunities denied, will not be taken in by politically
motivated posturing and machinated exaggerations," he said.
The forum, "Government of the Republic of the
Philippines – Moro Conflict: Is there an end in sight?" was
hosted by professor Solita Monsod and attended by former
President Joseph Estrada, former Senate President Franklin
Drilon, former Sen. Orlando Mercado, and Michael Mastura, a
member of the MILF negotiating panel and a former congressman of
the first district of Maguindanao.
Estrada assailed Arroyo for "entertaining"
the secessionist rebels, saying that "sometimes, men need to
wage war in order to achieve peace."
"The Philippine government has returned to
the old pattern of peace talks and cease-fire with
kidnap-for-ransom and other hostilities throughout," he said.
Estrada said he declared an all-out war
against the MILF in 2000 with the conviction that "it is the
duty of the commander-in-chief to protect the territorial
integrity of the country at all costs."
"I had had enough. I knew violence was never going to end
unless I declared an all-out war," he said.